Economics and management of enterprises

Adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the service sector to the conditions of Industry 4.0 and Society 4.0: evidence from the Czech Republic

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 191, Issue 7-8(1), Pages: 67-87

Citation information:
Dvořáková, L., Horák, J., Caha, Z., Machová, V., Hašková, S., Rowland, Z., & Krulický, T. (2021). Adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the service sector to the conditions of Industry 4.0 and Society 4.0: evidence from the Czech Republic. Economic Annals-XXI, 191(7-8(1)), 67-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V191-06

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Lilia Dvořáková
CSc. (Economics),
Professor,
Finance and Accounting Department,
Faculty of Economics,
University of West Bohemia
8 Univerzitní Str., Pilsen, 301 00, Czech Republic
ldvorako@kfu.zcu.cz
ORCID ID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6389-381X

Jakub Horák
Ing. (Economics),
School of Expertness and Valuation,
Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
517/10 Okružní, České Budějovice, 370 01, Czech Republic
horak@mail.vstecb.cz
ORCID ID:
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-6364-9745

Zdeněk Caha
PaedDr., PhD (Economics),
Faculty of Corporate Strategy,
Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
517/10 Okružní, České Budějovice, 370 01, Czech Republic
caha@mail.vstecb.cz
ORCID ID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-034X

Veronika Machová
Ing. (Economics),
School of Expertness and Valuation,
Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
517/10 Okružní, České Budějovice, 370 01, Czech Republic
machova@mail.vstecb.cz
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-6655

Simona Hašková
PhD (Economics),
School of Expertness and Valuation,
Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
517/10 Okružní, České Budějovice, 370 01, Czech Republic
haskova@mail.vstecb.cz
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4971-7972

Zuzana Rowland
PhD (Economics),
School of Expertness and Valuation,
Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
517/10 Okružní, České Budějovice, 370 01, Czech Republic
rowland@mail.vstecb.cz
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-8873

Tomáš Krulický
Ing. (Economics),
School of Expertness and Valuation,
Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
517/10 Okružní, České Budějovice, 370 01, Czech Republic
krulicky@mail.vstecb.cz
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0378-2699

Adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the service sector to the conditions of Industry 4.0 and Society 4.0: evidence from the Czech Republic

Abstract. Research background. The need for an in-time, efficient and effective adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the service sector to the technical, economic, social and environmental conditions of Industry 4.0 and Society 4.0 is a current problem caused by the introduction of new information and communication technologies, cyber-physical systems and artificial intelligence into all economic industries and areas of human life. The advent of new technologies is changing the entire value chains of Industry 4.0 – Labor 4.0 – Education 4.0 – Thinking 4.0, creating conditions for new business models but also pressure on flexibility and personalization of services or triggering new requirements for cyber security and the interdisciplinarity of access of small and medium-sized enterprises – providers and users of services. The current global COVID-19 health pandemic (2020-2021), with its economic and social impacts on all economic industries, has accelerated the use of disruptive technologies, principles, procedures, methods and tools of Industry 4.0 and Society 4.0 and the need for the support of small and medium-sized enterprises in the service sector in adapting to changes in the business environment.

Purpose of the article. The main objective of the research is to validate, evaluate and discuss the functionality and content of the created methodology of adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the service sector to the implementation of the principles, procedures, methods and tools of Society 4.0 and its applicability in business practice, specifically focusing on small and medium-sized enterprises in the area of knowledge-intensive services. An integral part of the research is to assess selected negative and positive impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on business processes in the context of issues being tackled.

Methodology. The methodological procedure to validate the functionality and content of the created methodology of the adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the service sector to the conditions of Society 4.0 is based on the strategy of mixed research. An explorative sequence design was used as a key design of mixed dynamically oriented research, during which quantitative data collection, analysis and evaluation formed the basis for qualitative analysis and evaluation, which resulted in the interpretation and discussion of the research results and, at the end of the paper, the formulation of the issues that will be the next area of scientific research activity of the author’s team. In the quantitative part of the research, Fisher’s exact test was used for the verification of difference statistics in data obtained from testing a sample of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises and from external project application sponsors providing services to this category of enterprises. In the qualitative part of the research, the Atlas.ti software was used for the evaluation of information obtained with respect to the methodology of adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises for encoding, processing and interpretation of qualitative data and semantic networks were created for the individual sub-categories of evaluation.

Findings & Value Added. The research result proved that the adequacy of the content and functionality of the checked methodology of adaptation of SMEs strongly corresponds to the needs and requirements of micro and small enterprises in particular that conduct business in the area of knowledge-intensive services. Barriers, limits, needs and potential in individual categories of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises were identified which are related to the use of technologies and tools of Society 4.0, to new requirements for knowledge and skills qualifications of labor and to the relation of SMEs to innovations in business processes. The results of validation of the methodology of adaptation of SMEs in the knowledge-intensive service sector confirmed that the created methodology of adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises is applicable to the implementation of the principles, procedures, methods and tools of Society 4.0. in the real conditions of business practice.

Keywords: Industry 4.0; Society 4.0; Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs); Methodology of Adaptation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises; Knowledge Intensive Services

JEL Classifications: L21; L80; M19; O14

Acknowledgements and Funding: This paper was created as the output of the project «TL02000136 – Knowledge-intensive services sector adaptation to the conditions of Society 4.0» of the University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Faculty of Economics and of the Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, with state support from the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic within the ÉTA programme.

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

Data Availability Statement: Dataset and other relevant materials are available from the authors upon request and on the website https://fek.zcu.cz/azis/#dokumenty.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V191-06

References

  1. Adaptation of knowledge intensive service sector to the conditions of Society 4.0. (2019). Official website of a research project of the Technological Agency of the Czech Republic.
    https://azis.zcu.cz (in Czech)
  2. Almada-Lobo, F. (2015). The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES). Journal of innovation management, 3(4), 16-21.
    https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_003.004_0003
  3. Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. Crown Publishing Group.
  4. Atik, H., & Ünlü, F. (2019). The measurement of Industry 4.0 performance through Industry 4.0 index: An empirical investigation for Turkey and European countries. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 852-860.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.123
  5. Campisi, D., Mancuso, P., Mastrodonato, S. L., & Morea, D. (2019). Efficiency assessment of knowledge intensive business services industry in Italy: Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and financial ratio analysis. Measuring Business Excellence, 23(4), 484-495.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-09-2019-0095
  6. Castelo-Branco, I., Cruz-Jesus, F., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union. Computers in Industry, 107, 22-32.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.007
  7. Czech Statistical Office. (2008). Classification of economic activities (CZ-NACE).
    https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/klasifikace_ekonomickych_cinnosti_cz_nace (in Czech)
  8. Czech Statistical Office. (2021a). Organization statistics – time lines.
    https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/res_cr (in Czech)
  9. Czech Statistical Office. (2021b). Czech Republic in International Comparison (Selected indicators) – 2020.
    https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/macroeconomics-m61vojl95t
  10. Chesbrought, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  11. Chládková, H. (2010). Specificities of the small and medium-sized enterprises in the Czech Republic and EU. Acta Universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 58(6), 161-170.
    https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201058060161
  12. Chmelař, A. et al. (2015). Impacts of digitization on labor markets in the Czech Republic and EU. Department of Strategy and Trends of the European Union (OSTEU).
    https://www.vlada.cz/assets/evropske-zalezitosti/analyzy-EU/Dopady-digitalizace-na-trh-prace-CR-a-EU.pdf (in Czech)
  13. Choi, J., Kim, B., Han, Ch. H., Hahn, H., Park, H., Yoo, J., & Jeong, M. K. (2021). Methodology for assessing the contribution of knowledge services during the new product development process to business performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 167, 113860.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113860
  14. Donthu, N., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. Journal of Business Research, 117, 284-289.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.008
  15. Dutton, H. W. (2014). Putting things to work: Social and policy challenges for the internet of things. Info, 16(3), 1-21.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/info-09-2013-0047
  16. Dvořáková, L., Vacek, J., Černá, M., Hejduková, P., Hinke, J., Taušl Procházková, P., Vallišová, L., Horák, J., Caha, Z., & Machová, V. (2020). Methodology of the adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the service sector to the implementation of principles, procedures, methods and tools of Society 4.0. (1st ed.). University of West Bohemia in Pilsen and Technical and Economic University in České Budějovice.
    https://doi.org/10.24132/ZCU.2020.09532 (in Czech)
  17. Dvořáková, L. (2019). Artificial intelligence in Society 4.0. Bookkeeping, 3, 26-28 (in Czech).
  18. European Commission. (2003). Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.
    http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2003/361/oj
  19. European Commission. (2021). SME competitiveness.
    https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/themes/sme-competitiveness
  20. European Commission. (2020). 2019 SBA Fact Sheet CZECHIA.
    https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/38662/attachments/7/translations/en/renditions/native
  21. European Commission. (2019). Digital society and economy index 2019 (DESI): Targeted investments and efficient digital strategies support performance of Member States.
    https://ec.europa.eu/czech-republic/news/190611_desi_cs#top-page
  22. Fairlie, R. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on small business owners: Evidence from the first three months after widespread social-distancing restrictions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 29(4), 727-740.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12400
  23. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
  24. Hillary, R. (2000). Small and medium-sized enterprises and the environment: Business imperatives. Greenleaf Publishing Limited.
    https://www.routledge.com/Small-and-Medium-Sized-Enterprises-and-the-Environment-Business-Imperatives/Hillary/p/book/9781874719229
  25. Hinke, J., Vokoun, M., Černá, M., Dvořáková, L., & Caha, Z. (2019). Typology of knowledge-intensive services for the purposes of adaptation to the conditions of Society 4.0 – Case study of the Czech Republic. In Kh. S. Soliman (Ed.),. Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, (pp. 1887-1898). Norristown, Pennsylvania: International Business Information Management Association.
  26. Ingaldi, M., & Ulewicz, R. (2020). Problems with the implementation of Industry 4.0 in enterprises from the SME sector. Sustainability, 12(1).
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010217
  27. Inkermann, D., Schneider, D., Martin, N. L., Lembeck, H., Zhang, J., & Thiede, S. (2019). A framework to classify Industry 4.0 technologies across production and product development. Procedia CIRP, 84, 973-978.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.218
  28. Kagermann, H., Lukas, W.-D., & Wahlster, W. (2011, April 1). Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution.
    https://www.vdi-nachrichten.com/Technik-Gesellschaft/Industrie-40-Mit-Internet-Dinge-Weg-4-industriellen-Revolution (in German)
  29. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. National Academy for Science and Engineering.
    https://www.din.de/blob/76902/e8cac883f42bf28536e7e8165993f1fd/recommendations-for-implementing-industry-4-0-data.pdf
  30. Keidanren – Japan Business Federation. (2018). Society 5.0 – Co-creating the future.
    https://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2018/095.html
  31. Keidanren – Japan Business Federation. (2020, May 19). Digital transformation -opening up the future through co-creation of values.
    https://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2020/038_summary.pdf
  32. Kovács, G., & Kot, S. (2016). New logistics and production trends as the effect of global economy changes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14, 115-126.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311981983_New_logistics_and_production_trends_as_the_effect_of_global_economy_changes
  33. Kruliš, K., Hajba, M., Frenkel, M., & Reguli, M. (2018). Digital new deal: Researching V4’s strategies for Society 4.0. Research Paper, 04. Association for International Affairs.
    https://www.amo.cz/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/AMO_digital-new-deal-researching-V4s-strategies-for-society-4.0_-1.pdf
  34. Llave, O. V. (2021). Telework, ICT-based mobile work in Europe: Trends, challenges and the right to disconnect. EMCO virtual meeting hosted by the Portuguese Presidency of the Council of the European Union.
    https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/da/publications/presentation/telework-ict-based-mobile-work-in-europe-trends-challenges-and-the-right-to-disconnect
  35. Mařík, V. et al. (2016). Industry 4.0: Challenge for the Czech Republic. Management Press (in Czech).
  36. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., & Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute.
    https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%20Digital/Our%20Insights/Disruptive%20technologies/MGI_Disruptive_technologies_Full_report_May2013.pdf
  37. MacDougall, W. (2014). Industrie 4.0 – smart manufacturing for the future. Germany Trade and Invest, Gesellschaft für Außenwirtschaft und Standortmarketing mbH.
    https://www.manufacturing-policy.eng.cam.ac.uk/documents-folder/policies/germany-industrie-4-0-smart-manufacturing-for-the-future-gtai/view
  38. Miles, I. D., Belousova, V., &  Chichkanov, N. (2019). Knowledge intensive business services: Innovation and occupations. Foresight, 21(3), 377-408. 
    https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2018-0091
  39. Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs of the Czech Republic. (2014). Action plan strategy of digital literacy of the Czech Republic for the period from 2015 to 2020.
    https://www.mpsv.cz/documents/20142/1357303/Akční+plán+Strategie+digitální+gramotnosti+České+republiky+na+období+2015+až+2020.pdf/46e8328d-4c1f-ac42-8980-d2742a3bc7ff (in Czech)
  40. Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs of the Czech Republic. (2016). Initiative of Labor 4.0.
    https://www.mpsv.cz/documents/20142/848077/studie_iniciativa_prace_4.0.pdf/62c5d975-d835-4399-e26b-d5fbb6dca948 (in Czech)
  41. Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic. (2016). Initiative of Industry 4.0.
    https://www.mpo.cz/assets/dokumenty/53723/64358/658713/priloha001.pdf (in Czech)
  42. Morrar, R., Arman, H., & Mousa, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11), 12-20.
    https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1117
  43. Müller, J. M. (2019). Business model innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises: Strategies for industry 4.0 providers and users. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1127-1142.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0008
  44. OECD. (2016). OECD Employment outlook.
    https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/oecd-employment-outlook-2016_empl_outlook-2016-en
  45. Office of the Government of the Czech Republic. (2017). Alliance for Society 4.0.
    https://www.databaze-strategie.cz/cz/urad-vlady/strategie/spolecnost-4-0-2017?typ=struktura (in Czech)
  46. Office of the Government of the Czech Republic. (2018). Research of the potential of artificial intelligence in the Czech Republic.
    https://www.vlada.cz/assets/evropske-zalezitosti/aktualne/AI-souhrnna-zprava-2018.pdf (in Czech)
  47. Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 127-182.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8
  48. Pan, M., Sikorski, J., Kastner, C. A., Akroyd, J., Mosbach, S., Lau, R., & Kraft, M. (2015). Applying Industry 4.0 to the Jurong Island Eco-Industrial Park. Energy Procedia, 75, 1536-1541.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.313
  49. Peraković, D., Periša, M., & Zorić, P. (2020). Challenges and issues of ICT in Industry 4.0. In Ivanov V. et al. (Eds.), Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing II, (pp. 259-269), (1st ed.). Springer.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22365-6_26
  50. Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., & Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in management studies: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 10(10), 3821.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103821
  51. PwC. (2017). Industry 4.0: Hype or reality? The current state of play in flemish manufacturing.
    https://www.industrie40vlaanderen.be/sites/default/files/downloads/industry-4.0-hype-or-reality.pdf
  52. Santos, C., Mehrsai, A., Barros, A. C., Araújo, M., & Ares, E. (2017). Towards Industry 4.0: An overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 972-979.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.093
  53. Schlechtendahl, J., Keinert, M., Kretschmer, F., Lechler, A., & Verl, A. (2015). Making existing production systems Industry 4.0-ready. Production Engineering, 9, 143-148.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0586-3
  54. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution: What it means, how to respond.
    https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond
  55. Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Bantam Books.
    https://www.weforum.org/about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab
  56. Skobelev, P. O., & Borovik, S. Yu. (2017). On the way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: From digital manufacturing to digital society. International Scientific Journal Industry 4.0, 2(6), 307-311.
    https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-the-way-from-Industry-4.0-to-Industry-5.0%3A-from-Skobelev-Yu./dd0676ec0c1f225900fff0729b516a075e195d8a
  57. Sommer, L. (2015). Industrial revolution – industry 4.0: Are German manufacturing SMEs the first victims of this revolution? Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(5), 1512-1532.
    https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1470
  58. Staněk, P., Mařík, V., Doliak, D., & Ondrovič, A. (2019). Facts and myths about society 5.0: Reflection on the future. Wolters Kluwer (in Slovak).
  59. Straková, J., Váchal et al. (2020). Small and medium-sized enterprises in the Czech Republic: Present time and vision. Grada Publishing (in Czech).
  60. Szalavetz, A. (2019). Industry 4.0 and capability development in manufacturing subsidiaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 384-395.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.027
  61. Taušl Procházková, P., Hejduková, P., Hinke, J., Horák, J., Machová, V., Vallišová, L., & Vokoun, M. (2019). Catalogue of changes of knowledge and skills qualification requirements for jobs in connection with the advent and development of Society 4.0. University of West Bohemia in Pilsen and Economic and Technical University in České Budějovice.
    https://www.fek.zcu.cz/blob.php?table=internet_list&name=FileName&type=FileType&file=Data&id=IDInternet&idname=5150 (in Czech)
  62. Tomek, G., & Vávrová, V. (2017). Industry 4.0 or nobody can win on their own. Praha: Professional publishing (in Czech).
  63. Vacek, J. (2017). On the road: From Industry 4.0 to Society 4.0. Trendy v podnikání (Trends in Business), 7(4), 43-49.
  64. Vacek, J., Dvořáková, L., Černá, M., Horák, J., Caha, Z., & Machová, V. (2019). Identification, analysis and evaluation of the principles, procedures, methods and tools for the adaptation of service sector to the technical, economic, social and environmental conditions of Society 4.0. NAVA.
    https://azis.zcu.cz (in Czech)
  65. Vaillant, Y., Lafuente, E., Horváth, K., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2021). Regions on course for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The role of a strong indigenous T-KIBS sector. Regional Studies, 55, 10-11, 1816-1828.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1899157
  66. Vance, A. (2015). Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX and the Quest for a fantastic future. Jan Melvil Publishing (in Czech).
  67. Vanhaverbeke, W., Frattini, F., Roijakkers, N., & Usman, M. (2018). Researching open innovation in SMEs. World Scientific Publishing.
    https://doi.org/10.1142/10733
  68. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2014). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
    https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
  69. Vojík, V. (2010). Specifics of business of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Czech Republic and abroad. Wolters Kluwer (in Czech).
  70. World Economic Forum. (2016, February 2). World economic forum annual meeting 2016: Mastering the fourth industrial revolution.
    https://www.weforum.org/reports/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2016-mastering-the-fourth-industrial-revolution
  71. Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
  72. Xu, M., David, J. M., & Kim, S. H. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Financial Research, 9(2), 90-95.
    https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90

Received 9.04.2021
Received in revised form 19.04.2021
Accepted 29.04.2021
Available online 10.08.2021

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , , , , ,

More Papers

Investigation of the social network marketing influence on consumer behavior with the mediating role of brand value (a case study for iPhone market)

Hezarkhani, M., Jalalinejad, R., Mohammadpour, F., & Mahmoudi, S. (2023). Investigation of the social network marketing influence on consumer behavior with the mediating role of brand value (a case study for iPhone market). Economic Annals-XXI, 203(5-6), 25-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V203-03

Economic Annals-XXI