Tax burden and innovation activities: the interrelation problem

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 137, Issue 1-2(1), Pages: 65-68

Citation information:
Radionova, I., & Boger, O. (2014). Tax burden and innovation activities: the interrelation problem. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(1), 65-68. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v137-17/


Iryna Radionova
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Ave, Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine
irina.radionova@gmail.com

Olena Boger
Postgraduate Student,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Ave, Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine
boger_a@ukr.net

Tax burden and innovation activities: the interrelation problem

Abstract. This article provides a study of the theoretical and applied aspects of the relationship between tax burden and innovation activities. The hypothesis of the transmission mechanism between tax burden and innovation activities might be illustrated by the following logical chain: Tax burden -> Tax incidence -> … -> Innovation activities. It is reasonable to interpret tax burden and tax incidence relationship in terms of the approach of «losses-benefits». This approach creates a theoretical basis for explaining not only the reversed, but also the direct link – a situation where the increase of tax burden (up to a certain optimal amount) does not limit innovation activities. An attempt is made to evaluate the closeness of this relationship between tax burden and innovation activities in EU countries and Ukraine. For the calculation based on panel data from 27 EU countries we used the information of eight parameters, six of which are indicators of tax burden, and the last two – indicators of innovation activities. The tax burden in the EU, as defined by the percentage of all collected taxes to GDP, and the share of direct taxes are closely related to two innovation activities indicators – innovation activities index and the share of expenditure on innovation activities in GDP. Our findings in the area of the relationship between indicators of tax burden and innovation activities in Ukraine give grounds to draw the following conclusions: this relationship is unlikely to exist or, if it exists, it is inverse, i.e. an increase in the tax burden, (as the share of total taxes in GDP and as the share of indirect taxes in GDP) limits the volume of innovation activities. The conclusions stress the importance of the investigation of the relationship between tax burden and innovation activities for the Government tax management decisions.

Keywords: Tax Burden; Tax Incidence; Innovation Activities; Tax Burden and Innovation Relationship Model; State Management

JEL Classification: Е10; Е62; H22; H39; O31; O57

References

  1. Blankart, Сh. (2006). Political Economics versus Public Choice. Kyklos, 59(2), 171-200.
    Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00330.x/
  2. Buchanan, J. M., & Brennan, G. (2006). The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Retrieved from http://files.libertyfund.org/files/2114/0102-09_LFeBk.pdf
  3. Entin, St. J. (2004, November 5). Tax incidence, Tax Burden, and Tax Shifting: Who Really Pays the Tax? CDA04-12.
    Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2004/11/tax-incidence-tax-burden-and-tax-shifting-who-really-pays-the-tax
  4. Harris, R., Cher, L. Q., & Trainor, M. (2009). Is a higher rate of R&D tax credit a panacea for low levels of R&D in disadvantaged regions? Research Policy, 38(1), 192-205.
    Retrieved from http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/4713/1/Research_Policy-_revised.pdf
  5. Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. B. (1984). Public finance in theory and practice (Fourth edition). McGraw-Hill Book Company (pp. 247-253).
    Retrieved from http://ebookily.org/txt/public-finance-in-theory-and-practice-richard-musgrave-peggy-musgrave
  6. Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the public sector (3rd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton. Retrieved from http://ebookbrowsee.net/professor-joseph-stiglitz-pdf-d642859175
  7. Thiethen, U. (2001, January). Fiscal decentralisation & economic growth in high-income OECD countries. Enepri Working Paper, 1.
    Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.199.8328&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  8. Varnalii, Z. S. (2008). Tax Policy in Ukraine: Current State, Problems and Prospects. Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy (in Ukr.).
  9. Mel’ota, I., Thiethen, U., & Vakhnenko, T. (2001, August). Fiscal and regulatory causes of the shadow economy in transition economy countries: the case of Ukraine.
    Retrieved from http://www.ier.com.ua/files/publications/WP/2001/Wp9_ukr.pdf (in Ukr.).
  10. Heiets, V. M., Semynozhenko, V. P., & Kvasniuk, B. Y. (2007). Strategic Challenges of the XXI century to the society and economy in Ukraine (in 3 volumes). Кyiv: Fenix (in Ukr.).
  11. Sokolovska, A. (2006). Theoretical foundations of tax burden definition and taxation level of economy. Ekonomika Ukrainy (Economy of Ukraine), 7, 4-12 (in Ukr.).
  12. Tarangul, L. L. (2003). Taxation and regional development (theory and practice). Irpin: Academy of State Tax Service of Ukraine (in Ukr.).
  13. Frolova, N. (2006). Taxation of income from labor and capital in Ukraine. Ekonomika Ukrainy (Economy of Ukraine), 12, 21-28.
    Retrieved from http://me.kmu.gov.ua/file/link/92338/file/frolova_12_06_U.pdf (in Ukr.).
  14. Ricardo, D. (1821). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (Third edition).
    Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Ricardo/ricP.html
  15. The European Union (2013). Taxation Trends in the European Union.
    Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/
    economic_analysis/tax_structures/2013/report.pdf
  16. Revenue Statistics 1965-2011.
    Retrieved from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/taxation/revenue-statistics-2012_rev_stats-2012-en-fr#page1
  17. The European Union (2013). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013.
    Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/facts-figures-analysis/innovation-scoreboard/index_en.htm
  18. The Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (2013). Indicators of the State Budget of Ukraine 1999-2012.
    Retrieved from http://www.minfin.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/archive/main?cat_id=77643
  19. The State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2013). Science and Innovation in Ukraine. Kyiv: Statistical Yearbook.
    Retrieved from http://ukrstat.gov.ua/

Received 04.11.2013