The process of administration in modern conditions: myths and reality

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 149, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 32-36

Citation information:
Peshkov, V., & Yaskova, N. (2015). The process of administration in modern conditions: myths and reality. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 32-36. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v149-08/

Vitaliy Peshkov
D.Sс. (Economics),
Professor,
Irkutsk State Technical University
83 Lermontov Str., Irkutsk, 664074, Russia
pvv@istu.edu

Natalia Yaskova
D.Sс. (Economics),
Professor,
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
26 Yaroslavsky Highway, Moscow, Russia
mcua3@yandex.ru

The process of administration in modern conditions: myths and reality

Abstract. The subject of this study is to solve the basic contradiction in the frames of the market economy between autonomy stakeholders and state regulation. The aim of the article is to substantiate the role of administrative resources to ensure sustainable development of the national economy. The authors explore the inherent properties, characteristics and nature of the impact on business activity. The authors used the approach for economic aspects analysis the administrative resources evaluation in terms of different economic goals achieving. Implementation of administrative resources functions predetermined the authors’ approach to the assessment of its cost-effectiveness. Formation of a common methodological approach to economic impact assessment of various kinds of administrative resources is not a trivial interdisciplinary task. Therefore, the authors propose as the base for assessing the following parameters as: the comparison of costs; tender achieved value reduction of the project’s program starting value; effect of reducing the value of the project cycle; the cumulative effect from realization economic, technical, information, organizational and social innovations; value of synergies resulting by the project and the subjective synchronization. The results of the study should be implemented in investment and construction programs to ensure competitiveness and efficiency of administrative resources usage.

Keywords: Administrative Resources; Public Administration; Economic Effectiveness; Tangible and Intangible Assets; Balance of Economic Interests

JEL Сlassіfіcatіon: H83; M10

References

1. Yaskova, N. (2009). Development of investment and construction processes in the context of globalization. Moscow: IAIEC (in Rus.).
2. Yaskova, N., & Karasik, D. (2013). Innovative focusing of urban investment programs (project format). Scientific Review, 5, 74-81 (in Rus.).
3. Kamenetsky, M., & Yaskova, N. (2009). Crisis of domestic model of management in construction and real estate market. Construction Economics, 3, 3-9 (in Rus.).
4. Cohen, S. I. (2014). Different institutional behavior in different economic systems: Theory and evidence on diverging systems worldwide. Economic Systems, 2, 223-442.
5. Hindle, T. (2008). The Economist Guide to Management Ideas and Gurus. John Wiley & Sons.
6. Myant, M., & Drahokoupil, J. (2010). Transition Economies: Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-59619-7.
7. Toyofuku, K. (2013). Stability or restructuring? Macroeconomic dynamics under soft budget constraint problems. Economic Systems, 4, 625-649.
8. Yip, G. (1982). Barriers to Entry: A Corporate Strategy Perspective. Lexington Books.
9. Yaskova, N., & Matveeva, M. (2014). Innovative focus of the investment activity within the modernization of the national economy. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(1), 42-45.
   Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v137-11/
10. Peshkov, V., & Kasyanchik, P. (2014). Problems of the investment and construction sector development in conditions of the national economy modernization. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(1), 50-53.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v137-13/

Received 29.03.2015