Estimation of structural bank units’ territorial distribution in Ukraine

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 158, Issue 3-4(2), Pages: 75-78

Citation information:
Kyrychenko, K. (2016). Estimation of structural bank units’ territorial distribution in Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 158(3-4(2)), 75-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-17


Kateryna Kyrychenko
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Kherson National Technical University
24 Beryslavske shose Str., Kherson, 73008, Ukraine
ekaterina-kolisni@meta.ua

Estimation of structural bank units’ territorial distribution in Ukraine

Abstract. Introduction. The ramified network of bank institutions provides migration of money facilities within the territory of Ukraine and provides access of economic agents to financial resources, creates conditions for economic development of individual territories and public welfare. Purpose. To conduct an analysis of the number of structural bank units in Ukraine on the territorial basis and determine different factors affecting the development and functioning of their networks. Results. A number of factors impact the distribution of structural bank units. Some factors promote geographical expansion of structural bank units, while others force to narrow the presence of banks in individual regions. Conclusions. There are several reasons behind the trends in reduction of the number of structural bank units. First of all, it is because of the annexation of the Crimea and the events in Donbas that forced to close banks in those territories. Secondly, it is the influence of the world financial crisis, a decline in business activity in Ukraine, a decrease in personal incomes and, as a result, a decline of profitability of banks. The reduction of the number of those structural bank units which have become unprofitable is one of the consequences of this process. Thirdly, it is a swift development of bank technologies, introduction of distant servicing remote service of clients, wide use of e-money, as well as the absence of need for the large number of structural bank units, which naturally conduces to the reduction of their number. Also, the policy of the National Bank of Ukraine aimed at the liquidation of small and financially unsteady banks has affected the number of banks in Ukraine.

Keywords: Bank; Structural Bank Unit; Banking System; Financial Resources; Policy of the National Bank of Ukraine

JEL Classіfіcatіon: G10; G21; G24

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-17

References

  1. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.
    Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227418147_
    The_Impact_of_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_on_the_Cost_of_Bank_Loans
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002
  2. Weber, O., Fenchel, M., & Scholz, R. (2008). Empirical analysis of the integration of environmental risks into the credit risk management process of European banks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(3), 149-159.
    Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.507/abstract
    doi: 10.1002/bse.507
  3. Zeidan, R., Boechat, С., & Fleury, А. (2015). Developing a Sustainability Credit Score System. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 283-296.
    Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2752439
    doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-2034-2
  4. Іsaeva, N. (2012). The market of banking services at the current stage of development. Bіznes Іnform (Business Inform), 6, 162-165 (in Ukr.).
  5. Dovhan, J. (2013). The level of the capital concentration in the banking system of Ukraine and its financial stability relationship. Nauka i ekonomika (Science and Economics), 1, 7-15 (in Ukr.).
  6. Somyk, A. (2014). Increasing the trust to banks in Ukraine. Problemy i perspektyvy bankivskoi systemy Ukrainy (Problems and Prospects of the Banking System of Ukraine), 38, 250-257 (in Ukr.).
  7. Vladymyr, A. (2014). Ways of strengthening of the domestic banks position on the banking market of Ukraine. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava (Socio-economic Problems and State), 1(10), 221-232 (in Ukr.).
  8. Vasylchuk, I. (2015). Sustainable development as a new strategy for commercial banks. Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 11-12, 105-108.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v155-23/ (in Ukr.)
  9. Ognyov, D., & Popova, E. (2014). Some aspects of the banks’ fiduciary management. Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 9-10(2), 28-31.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v145-07/ (in Ukr.)
  10. Kotkovskyi, V., & Guzenko, O. (2015). Banking Innovation in the System of Measures to Improve Corporate Culture: Methodological Aspects. Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 1-2(2), 39-42.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v148-10/ (in Ukr.)
  11. Cherniavskyi, I. (2014). The current state and prospects of development of the branch network of banks in Ukraine. Biznes Inform (BusinessInform), 3.
    Retrieved from http://www.business-inform.net/annotated-catalogue/?year=2014&abstract=2014_03_0 (in Ukr.)
  12. Ischenko, O. (2012). Analysis of the level of development of regional bank network. Ekonomika, financy, pravo (Economy, Finance, Law), 7, 35-39 (in Ukr.).
  13. The National Bank of Ukraine (2016). Main indicators of banks in Ukraine for 2005-2015.
    Retrieved from http://www.bank.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=36807&cat_id=36798 (in Ukr.)
  14. The State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Socio-economic development of Ukraine for 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012.
    Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (in Ukr.)

Received 12.02.2016