Estimation of confidence level for Value-at-Risk: statistical analysis

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 158, Issue 3-4(2), Pages: 83-87

Citation information:
Zabolotskyy, T. (2016). Estimation of confidence level for Value-at-Risk: statistical analysis. Economic Annals-XXI, 158(3-4(2)), 83-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-19


Taras Zabolotskyy
PhD (Economics),
Lviv Institute of the University of Banking
9 Taras Shevchenko Ave., Lviv, 79005, Ukraine
zjabka@yahoo.com

Estimation of confidence level for Value-at-Risk: statistical analysis

Abstract. The paper investigates the problem of estimation of the confidence level for Value-at-Risk to get the minimum VaR portfolio with a predefined level of expected return. The equation which describes the relation between the confidence level and the rate of the expected return depends on the unknown parameters of distribution of asset returns which should be estimated. The classical sample estimators for unknown parameters are used. The author has examined the properties of the estimator for the confidence level in considerable detail. Under the assumption that the asset returns are multivariate, we find the asymptotic distribution of the estimator for the confidence level. Moreover, we extend this result to the case of elliptically contoured distributed asset returns. Based on the distributional properties, the confidence interval for the confidence level for VaR is constructed and the test procedure whether the resulting portfolio is statistically different from the global minimum variance portfolio is provided. Using a simulation study, we demonstrate that our results give a good approximation even in the case of moderate sample sizes n=250, n=500 not only in the case of normally distributed asset returns, but also when asset returns follow the elliptically countered distribution. We have concluded that investors can use the results of the paper with regard to all sectors of the economy.

We used monthly asset returns of five stocks included into Dow Jones Index, namely: McDonald’s, Johnson&Johnson, Procter&Gamble, AT&T, and Verizon Communications from 01 October 2010 to 01 September 2015 to give numerical illustration of our fundamental results.

Keywords: Portfolio Selection Problem; Value-at-Risk; Variance; Expected Return; Sample Estimator; Risk Measure

JEL Classification: G11; G17; C13

Acknowledgements. The author of the article is thankful to Professor Wolfgang Schmid for suggestions which have improved an earlier version of this paper. The author is thankful for the financial support to the European Commission via ERASMUS MUNDUS Action 2 HERMES project 2013-2596/001-001-EMA2 «Statistical analysis of optimal portfolios».

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-19

References

  1. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77-91.
    Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x/full
    doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
  2. Merton, R. C. (1972). An analytical derivation of the efficient frontier. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7, 1851-1872.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2329621
  3. Krokhmal, P., Zabarankin, M., & Uryasev, S. (2011). Modeling and optimization of risk, Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 16, 49-66.
    Retrieved from http://www.ise.ufl.edu/uryasev/files/2011/11/Modeling_and_Optimization_of_Risk.pdf
    doi: 10.1016/j.sorms.2010.08.001
  4. Basel committee on banking supervision (2001, January). Operational risk consultative document, supporting document to the New Basel Capital Accord.
    Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsca02.pdf
  5. Alexander, G. J., & Baptista, M. A. (2002). Economic implication of using a mean-VaR model for portfolio selection: a comparison with mean-variance analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 26, 1159-1193.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(01)00041-0
  6. Bodnar, T., Schmid, W., & Zabolotskyy, T. (2012). Minimum VaR and Minimum CVaR optimal portfolios: estimators, confidence regions, and tests. Statistics & Risk Modeling, 29, 281-314.
    Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260986489_
    Minimum_VaR_and_minimum_CVaR_optimal_portfolios_Estimators_confidence_regions_and_tests
    doi: 10.1524/strm.2012.1118
  7. Rockafellar, R. T., Uryasev, S., & Zabarankin, M. (2006). Optimality conditions in portfolio analysis with general deviation measures. Mathematical Programming, Ser. B, 108, 515-540.
    Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10107-006-0721-9
    doi: 10.1007/s10107-006-0721-9
  8. Rockafellar, R. T., Uryasev, S., & Zabarankin, M. (2006). Master funds in portfolio analysis with general deviation measures. Journal of Banking & Finance30, 743-778.
    Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222556409_
    Master_Funds_in_Portfolio_Analysis_with_General_Aviation_Measures
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.04.004
  9. Kilianova, S., & Pflug, G. Ch. (2009). Optimal pension fund management under multiperiod risk minimization. Annals of Operations Research, 166, 261-270.
    Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-008-0405-3
    doi: 10.1007/s10479-008-0405-3
  10. Bodnar, T., & Zabolotskyy, T. (2013). Maximization of the Sharpe ratio of an asset portfolio in the context of risk minimization. Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 11-12, 110-113 (in Ukr.).
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v135-28/
  11. Zabolotskyy, T., & Bilyi, O. (2014). The relation between Value-at-Risk minimization and the return level of financial assets portfolio. Ekonomichna kibernetyka (Economic Cybernetics), 1-3(85-87), 23-30.
  12. Gupta, A. K., Varga, T., & Bodnar, T. (2013). Elliptically contoured models in statistics and portfolio theory. New York: Springer.
  13. Fama, E. F. (1976). Foundations of finance. New York: Basic Books.
  14. DasGupta, A. (2008). Asymptotic theory of statistics and probability. New York: Springer.
  15. Bodnar, T., Schmid, W., & Zabolotskyy, T. (2009). Statistical inference of the efficient frontier for dependent asset returns. Statistical papers, 50, 593-604.
    Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00362-007-0108-x
    doi: 10.1007/s00362-007-0108-x
  16. Chamberlain, G. A. (1983). A characterization of the distributions that imply mean-variance utility functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 29, 185-201.
    Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223055874_
    A_Characterization_of_the_Distributions_That_Imply_Mean-Variance_Utility_Functions
    doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(83)90129-1
  17. Berk, J. B. (1997). Necessary conditions for the CAPM. Journal of Economic Theory, 73, 245-257.
    Retrieved from http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=22415
    doi: 10.1006/jeth.1996.2218

Received 20.01.2016