Methodological approaches to assessment of intersectoral competitiveness

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 162, Issue 11-12, Pages: 43-47

Citation information:
Kucherenko, S., Levaieva, L., & Semenenko, O. (2016). Methodological approaches to assessment of intersectoral competitiveness. Economic Annals-XXI, 162(11-12), 43-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V162-09

Svitlana Kucherenko
PhD (Economics),
Assistant Professor,
Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky Hryhoriy Skovoroda State Pedagogical University
32 Sukhomlynsky Str., Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky, 08401, Ukraine
ksvetau@mail.ru

Liudmyla Levaieva
PhD (Economics),
Assistant Professor,
Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky Hryhoriy Skovoroda State Pedagogical University
32 Sukhomlynsky Str., Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky, 08401, Ukraine
lluda85@mail.ru

Olena Semenenko
Senior Lecturer,
Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky Hryhoriy Skovoroda State Pedagogical University
32 Sukhomlynsky Str., Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky, 08401, Ukraine
gazisovna@mail.ru

Methodological approaches to assessment of intersectoral competitiveness

Abstract. The need to find ways of overcoming an economic crisis requires improvement of current methodical instruments for assessment of industry competitiveness. The article suggests a method for the assessment of intersectoral competitiveness based on two integral figures (static and dynamic) and fuzzy inferences presented in the form of a set of linguistic vector estimates. The authors have conducted a comparative analysis within the mentioned instruments and the analytical graphical method of competitiveness assessment. The authors have researched the dynamics of competitiveness of ten Ukraine’s industries in 2013-2015 by applying the presented model. A backward analysis of the most critical links and factors influencing industry competitiveness has been conducted.

It has been concluded that the presented methodology is more flexible and open for the correction of directions, indices and normative indicators of industry activity.

Keywords: Competitiveness; Intersectoral Competitiveness; Competitiveness Assessment Method for Industry; Static and Dynamic Figures; Methods of Fuzzy Set Theory

JEL Classification: С18; Е13; О11; О47

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V162-09

References

1. Lukianenko, D. H., Poruchnyk, А. М., Antoniuk, L. L. et al. (2006). Managing international competitiveness under conditions of globalization of economic development. Monograph. Kyiv: KNEU (in Ukr.).
2. Krylova, N. V. (2012). Methodological approaches to quantitative assessment of industry competitiveness. Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannia ekonomiky (Theoretical and Applied Matters of Economics), 27(3), 186-196 (in Ukr.).
3. Borysova, Т. М. (2011). Industry competitiveness: determinants of formation and modern assessment methods. Visnyk Hmelnytskogo natsionalnoho universytetu (Herald of Khmelnitsky National University), 6(1), 54-60. (in Ukr.).
4. Hryha, V. Yu., & Lykholet, S. І. (2011). Essence and assessment of competitiveness and industries in the regional context. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskogo universytetu (Herald of Uzhhorod University), 33(2), 45-51. (in Ukr.).
5. Shevchenko, M. M. (2006). Methods of competitiveness evaluation for industries in terms of internationalization. Kharkiv: National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» (in Ukr.).
6. Oklander, M. A. (2003). Formation of the Logistic System’s in Enterprises. Odessa: Odessa State Economics University (in Ukr.).
7. Bezzubchenko, О. А. (2009). Assessment of competitiveness of national economy industries under globalization conditions. Ekonomichnyi prostir. (Economic Scope), 21, 85-93 (in Ukr.).
8. Drahan, О. І. (2006). Managing competitiveness of enterprises: theoretical aspects. Kyiv: DAKKKiM (in Ukr.).
9. Porter, М. (2005). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Moscow: Alpina Biznes Buks (in Russ.).
10. Liesner, H. (1958). The European common market and British industry. Economic Journal, 68(270), 302-316.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2227597
11. Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. (1998). Strategic management. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
12. Fathutdinov, R. А. (2005). Management of organization competitiveness. Moscow: Eksmo (in Russ.).
13. Virasa T., & Tang C. S. J. (1998). The Role of Technology in International Trade: A Conceptual Model for Developing Countries. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 9(2), 195-205.
    Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047831098900049
14. Arthur, A., Thompson, Jr., & Strickland ІІІ, A. J. (2006). Strategic management: concepts and cases. Moscow: Vilyams (in Russ.).
15. Yelets, О. P., & Bohdan, Ye. V. (2014). Essence of competition and competitiveness of an enterprise, Ekonomichnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii (The Economic Herald of Zaporizhzhia State Engineering Academy) 7, 82-91 (in Ukr.).
16. Pochtaruk, I. S. (2016). Organizational-economic maintenance of coal industry competitiveness in the Western region of Ukraine. Lviv: Institute of Regional Research named after M. I. Dolishniy of the NAS of Ukraine (in Ukr.).
17. Andreichikov, А. V., & Andreichikova, О. N. (2000). Analysis, synthesis, and planning solutions in the economy. Moscow: Finansy i statistika (in Russ.).
18. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (in Ukr.)

Received 1.10.2016