Economics and management of enterprises

Land fragmentation of agricultural enterprises in the context of administration of land

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 176, Issue 3-4, Pages: 80-90

Citation information:
Popov, A., Koshkalda, I. Kniaz, O., & Trehub, O. (2019). Land fragmentation of agricultural enterprises in the context of administration of land. Economic Annals-XXI, 176(3-4), 80-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V176-08

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Andriy Popov
D.Sc. (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Professor of the Land Management and Cadastre Department
V. V. Dokuchayev Kharkiv National Agrarian University
Dokuchayevske 2, Kharkiv district, Kharkiv region, 62483, Ukraine
popov_andriy@knau.kharkov.ua
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7292-8818

Iryna Koshkalda
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Headof the Land Management and Cadastre Department
V. V. Dokuchayev Kharkiv National Agrarian University
Dokuchayevske 2, Kharkiv district, Kharkiv region, 62483, Ukraine
irinavit1506@gmail.com
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-8890

Oleksandr Kniaz
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Associate Professorof the Land Management and Cadastre Department
V. V. Dokuchayev Kharkiv National Agrarian University
Dokuchayevske 2, Kharkiv district, Kharkiv region, 62483, Ukraine
beskjet@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-3394

Olena Trehub
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor of the Land Management and Cadastre Department
V. V. Dokuchayev Kharkiv National Agrarian University
Dokuchayevske 2, Kharkiv district, Kharkiv region, 62483, Ukraine
o.trehub@gmail.com
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-1638

Land fragmentation of agricultural enterprises in the context of administration of land

Abstract. Introduction. Under the conditions of the excessive lease of the agricultural land in Ukraine, leasing is identified as a tool for amalgamation of land parcels into one field. However, the consequences of excessive land lease by the agricultural enterprises are both positive and negative. Often the negative consequences of such leasing lack attention from the part of policy makers and scientists.

The purpose of this study is to examine how the land administration system matches the land fragmentation and what problems are faced by agricultural enterprises when concluding lease contracts under the conditions of land fragmentation in Ukraine.

Results. The obtained data testify that the land administration system in Ukraine has signs of transparency and efficiency. However, the system of land administration does not meet the requirements of the ownership fragmentation in land use of agricultural enterprises. Thus, the registration of lease rights to hundreds of the land parcels requires considerable costs and time. The long-lasting registration of the lease rights to the land parcels forces the lessees to use them illegally during the registration procedure. It has been determined that the expenditures on the registration of the lease right to the state-owned land parcel are much lower in comparison with the registration of private parcels.

Conclusions. One of the ways to reduce the time and cost of the registration of land parcels and rights to them is to increase the size of the land parcel per one landowner, thus reducing the number of the leased parcels in the structure of the agricultural enterprise. It is convenient to introduce a special administrative service aimed at registering lease rights of agricultural enterprises.

Keywords: Land Fragmentation; Land Administration; Registration; Lease Right; Land Parcel; Costs

JEL Classification: Q15; Q10; R14; C49

Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V176-08

References

  1. AgroPolit.com (2018). In the area of raider risk – 10-15% of all land lease contracts.
    Retrieved from https://agropolit.com/news/8243-v-zoni-reyderskogo-riziku–10-15-vsih-dogovoriv-orendi-zemli (in Ukr.)
  2. Bennett, R., Rajabifrad, A., Williamson, I., & Wallace, J. (2012). On the need for national land administration infrastructures. Land Use Policy, 20(1), 208-219.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.008
  3. Bentley, J. W. (1987). Economic and ecological approaches to land fragmentation: in defence of a much-maligned phenomenon. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16, 31-67.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.000335
  4. Bogaerts, T., & Zevenbergen, J. (2001). Cadastral systems – alternatives. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems, 25(4-5), 325-337.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00051-X
  5. De Zeeuw, K., & Salzmann, M. (2011). Cadastral innovation driven by society: evolution or revolution? Bridging the Gap between Cultures: proceedings of the FIG Working Week, May 18-22, 2011. (pp. 1-11). Marrakech, Morocco.
    Retrieved from http://www.fig.net/pub/fig2011/papers/ts01b/ts01b_dezeeuw_salzmann_4873.pdf
  6. Demetriou, D., Stillwell, J., & See, L. (2013). A new methodology for measuring land fragmentation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 39, 71-80.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.02.001
  7. The World Bank Group (2019). Doing Business 2019. Economy Profile of Ukraine (16th edition). A World Bank Group Flagship Report.
    Retrieved from http://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/country/u/ukraine/UKR.pdf
  8. Enemark, S., Williamson, I., & Wallace, J. (2010). Building modern land administration systems in developed economies. Journal of Spatial Science, 50(2), 51-68.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2005.9635049
  9. Hartvigsen, M. (2014). Land reform and land fragmentation in Central and Eastern Europe. Land Use Policy, 36, 330-341.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.016
  10. Hrab, R. (2016, November 23). The price of sharing, or how much the tenant pays. Vox Ukraine.
    Retrieved from https://voxukraine.org/uk/cina-rozpauvannya-ua (in Ukr.)
  11. King, R., & Burton, S. (1982). Land fragmentation: Notes on a fundamental rural spatial problem. Progress in Human Geography, 6(4), 475-494.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258200600401
  12. McPherson, M. F. (1982). Land fragmentation: A selected literature review. Development Discussion Paper, No. 141. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University.
  13. Popov, A. (2017). Assessment of land fragmentation of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 164(3-4), 56-60.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V164-13
  14. Popov, A. S. (2018). Institutional Foundations of Agricultural Land Consolidation: Theory, Methodology, Practice (Doctoral Dissertation). Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchayev. Kharkiv.
    Retrieved from http://www.lnau.edu.ua/lnau/attachments/5163_dis.pdf (in Ukr.)
  15. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2019). Some issues of improvement of management in the field of use and protection of agricultural land of state ownership and disposal by them. The Cabinet Decree No.413, in edition as of June 25, 2019.
    Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/413-2017-%D0%BF (in Ukr.)
  16. Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2002). Consolidation initiatives after land reform: responses to multiple dimensions of land fragmentation in Eastern European agriculture. Journal of International Development, 14(7), 1005-1018.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.905
  17. Sklenicka, P., & Salek, M. (2008). Ownership and soil quality as sources of agricultural land fragmentation in highly fragmented ownership patterns. Landscape Ecology, 23(3), 299-311.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9185-4
  18. Nizalov, D., Ivinska, K., Kubakh, S., Nivyevskyi, O., & Prokopenko, O. (Eds.) (2016). Monitoring of land relations in Ukraine in 2014-2015. Statistical Yearbook. Kyiv: School of Economics.
    Retrieved from http://www.kse.org.ua/download.php?downloadid=451 (in Ukr.)
  19. The State Service of Ukraine for Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre (StateGeoCadastre) (2018). Monitoring of land relations in Ukraine in 2016-2017. Statistical Yearbook.
    Retrieved from http://land.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/monitoring.pdf (in Ukr.)
  20. Van der Molen, P. (2002). The dynamic aspect of land administration: An often-forgotten component in system design. Computers, Environment, Urban Systems, 26(5), 361-381.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00009-1
  21. Van Dijk, T. (2003). Dealing with Central European Land Fragmentation: A Critical Assessment on the Use of Western European Instruments (Doctoral dissertation). Delft: Uitgeverij Eburon.
    Retrieved from https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:eb4e1e43-499c-46eb-8322-38c1dceb9d52?collection=research
  22. van Dijk, T. (2003). Scenarios of Central European land fragmentation. Land Use Policy, 20(2), 149-158.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00082-0
  23. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1998). On the Land Lease. Law of Ukraine, in edition as of January 1, 2019.
    Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/161-14 (in Ukr.)
  24. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2004). On the State Registration of Property Rights to Real Estate and their Restrictions. Law of Ukraine, in edition as of February 4, 2019.
    Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1952-15 (in Ukr.)
  25. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2012). On State land cadastre. Law of Ukraine, in edition as of January 1, 2019.
    Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3613-17 (in Ukr.)
  26. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2018). On the State budget for 2019. Law of Ukraine, in edition as of March 23, 2019.
    Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2629-19 (in Ukr.)
  27. Williamson, I. P. (2001). Land Administration «Best Practice» Providing the Infrastructure for Land Policy Implementation. Land Use Policy, 18(4), 297-307.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00021-7

Received 10.03.2019
Received in revised form 29.03.2019
Accepted 5.04.2019
Available online 20.08.2019

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , , ,

More Papers

Investigation of the social network marketing influence on consumer behavior with the mediating role of brand value (a case study for iPhone market)

Hezarkhani, M., Jalalinejad, R., Mohammadpour, F., & Mahmoudi, S. (2023). Investigation of the social network marketing influence on consumer behavior with the mediating role of brand value (a case study for iPhone market). Economic Annals-XXI, 203(5-6), 25-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V203-03

Economic Annals-XXI