Quality of life as an indicator of public management performance in the Republic of Kazakhstan
Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 184, Issue 7-8, Pages: 133-153
Citation information:
Rakhmetova, A., & Budeshov, Ye. (2020). Quality of life as an indicator of public management performance in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Economic Annals-XXI, 184(7-8), 133-153. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V184-12
Aibota Rakhmetova
PhD (Economics),
Professor,
Department of Economic Theory and State, Local Government,
Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz
9 Academicheskaya Str., Karaganda, 100009, Republic of Kazakhstan
aibota@mail.ru;
rakhmetova.aibota@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8741-0373
Yeraly Budeshov
PhD Student (State and Local Government),
Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz
9 Academicheskaya Str., Karaganda, 100009, Republic of Kazakhstan
yeraly_budeshov@mail.ru;
yeraly.budeshov@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1676-2902
Quality of life as an indicator of public management performance in the Republic of Kazakhstan
Abstract. We examine quality of life issues in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Based on systematization of theoretical approaches to the definition of a concept and structure of living standards found in scientific literature and their critical analysis, we have identified and justified the fundamental structural blocks of the quality of life as a complex aggregate indicator reflecting the level of development of many areas of a modern person’s life together affecting the degree of his or her life activity’s efficiency.
Using an extensive range of statistical data and tools of economic and mathematical modeling, we aim to identify the degree of influence of macroeconomic indicators that characterize certain areas of human life (healthcare, education, living conditions, security, income level, etc.) on living standards.
Given the above, the central hypothesis of this study is that public management of the quality of life in the Republic of Kazakhstan can be more effective if it provides a scientifically grounded system of tools based on the assessment of the quality of life which takes into account both regional and industry specifics, feedback from the population as a recipient of public services, and is based on the principle of integration and consistency of state body management decisions.
Results we have obtained imply the existence of a correlation between such quantitative indicators as natural growth, a number of pension recipients, the Gini coefficient and the quality of life index determined by qualitative indicators: general life satisfaction of the population and the level of perception of happiness. Results of the study confirm current trends in the socio-economic development of Kazakhstan, characterized by income inequality issues in both intersectoral and interregional sections, aggravated against the background of the global pandemic threat, the recession of a prolonged nature, and other external shocks and challenges.
Based on the results obtained, the authors conclude that the key causes of socio-economic differentiation in Kazakhstan are associated with a weak institutional environment and weak performance of formal institutions. The quality of institutions impacts the process of socio-economic development in a creative way, including through the formation of an appropriate institutional environment regulating the entire set of socio-economic relations. This circumstance emphasizes the priority of challenges state management bodies face in the context of improving the existing institutional environment, which allows determination of rational behavior boundaries for people and economic entities to optimize and stabilize the socio-economic development of the state as a whole.
We have developed and proposed a number of suggestions and recommendations for improving the existing institutional environment and the system of state management, practical implementation of which should reduce the existing large gap in income levels as the main factor of living standards in Kazakhstan.
Keywords: Living Standards; Income Inequality; Life Satisfaction; Natural Growth of the Population; Happiness; Public Administration; State; Institutions
JEL Classifications: Е24; Е41; Е64; I18; J28; J31
Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.
Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V184-12
References
- Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2020). Official website of the Bureau of National Statistics.
https://stat.gov.kz (in Kazakh) - Aliyev, U. T. (2014). Economic Growth, Living Standards and Inequality in Oil-Producing Countries of the Post-Soviet Space. Living Standards in the Regions of Russia, 192(2), 97-108.
https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21774508& - Berveno, O. V. (2014). The Excessive Income Inequality Impact on Quality of Life. The Problems of Economy, 1, 304-308.
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-chrezmernogo-neravenstva-dohodov-na-kachestvo-zhizni (in Russ.) - European Central Bank. (2019). Official website of Euro Foreign Exchange Reference Rates.
https://www.ecb.europa.eu - Eurostat. (2019). Official website of the Statistical Office of the European Union.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/statistics-a-z/abc - Galbraith, J. K. (1958). The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
https://www.worldcat.org/title/affluent-society/oclc/167255 - Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., & De Neve, J.-E. (Eds.). (2020). World Happiness Report 2020. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2020 - Kalkabayeva, G., Rakhmetova, A., Nakipova, G., Bespayevа, R., Borbasova, Z., Saifullina Y. (2020). Financial Sector Assets, Real Innovation and Economic Growth: Assessment of Interconnection and Influence of Regulatory Instruments. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 559-577.
https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(34) - Inequality and Welfare in Quality of Life Among OECD Countries: Non-parametric Treatment of Ordinal Data. Social Indicators Research, 143, 201-232.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1962-8 - Kozlova, O. A., Gladkova, T. V., Makarova, M. N., & Tukhtarova, Ye. Kh. (2015). Methodological Approach to Measuring the Quality of Life of The Region’s Population. Economics of the Region, 2(1), 182-193.
https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2015.2.011 (in Russ.) - Kuzembekova, R., Sadvakassova, A., & Iskakbayeva, M. (2013). Analysis of the current state and influence on the quality of life of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Life Science Journal, 10(11s), 276-281.
https://doi.org/10.7537/marslsj1011s13.49 - Lobont, O. R., Vatavu, S., Glont, O. R., & Mihit, L. D. (2019). Quality of Government and Well-being: Assessing the Gap in European Countries, Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 22(s1), 69-82.
https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2019-0005 - Magomayev, M. M. (2006). Quality of Life of the Population (Theory, Methodology, and Mechanisms). [Doctoral dissertation, Dagestan State University]. Russian State Library.
https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01003312802 (in Russ.) - Michalos, A. C., & Hatch, P. M. (2019). Good Societies, Financial Inequality and Secrecy, and a Good Life: from Aristotle to Piketty. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15, 1005-1054.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09717-0 - Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2019). Official website of the State Revenue Committee.
https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/kgd?lang=kk (in Kazakh) - Mironenkov, A. A. (2020). Hierarchical Pareto classification of the Russian regions by the population’s quality of life indicators. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(2), 171-185.
https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.2.68.11 (in Russ.) - Morozova, T. V., Belaya, R. V., & Murina, S. G. (2013). Quality of Life Assessment Based on Indicators of Socio-economic Well-being of People. In Transactions of Karelian Research Centre of Russian Academy of Science, 5, 140-146.
http://transactions.krc.karelia.ru/publ.php?plang=e&id=11276 (in Russ.) - Nagimova, A. M. (2010). A Sociological Analysis of the Quality of Life of the Population: Regional Aspect. Kazan State University.
https://kpfu.ru/docs/F540618236/3_Monogr3.pdf (in Russ.) - National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2020). Official website of Average Exchange Rates for the Period.
https://nationalbank.kz (in Kazakh) - Niazbekova, Sh., Aetdinova, R., Yerzhanova, S., Suleimenova, B., & Maslova, I. (2020). Tools of the Government Policy in the Area of Controlling Poverty for the Purpose of Sustainable Development. 2nd International Conference on Pedagogy, Communication and Sociology (pp. 305-310).
https://doi.org/10.12783/dtssehs/icpcs2020/33886 - Nyussupova, G. N., Brade, I., Kairova, S. G., & Kenespayeva, L. B. (2019). Social indicators of the quality of life of the population of the Republic of Kazakhstan: analysis and evaluation. Journal of Geography and Environmental Management, 52(1), 48-56.
https://doi.org/10.26577/JGEM.2019.v52.i1.05 - Polterovich, V., Popov, V., & Tonis, A. (2007). Economic Policy, Quality of Institutions, and Mechanisms of Resource Curse. Higher School of Economics, 98.
http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/22454 (in Russ.) - Rakhmetova, A., Kalkabayeva, G., Iskakova, Z., Kurmanalina, A., & Turmakhanbetova, G. (2019). Institutional Conditions of Interaction of Financial-credit and Innovative Economic Sectors. Entrepreneurship and sustainability Issues, 7(1), 704-713.
http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(51) - Ratnikova, T. (2006). Introduction to Econometric Panel Data Analysis. Economic Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 10(2), 267-316.
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vvedenie-v-ekonometricheskiy-analiz-panelnyh-dannyh (in Russ.) - Rossoshanskii, A. I. (2016). Methodology for the Index Assessment of the Quality of Life in Russian Regions. Territorial Development Issues, 84(4), 124-137.
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metodika-indeksnoy-otsenki-kachestva-zhizni-naseleniya-rossiyskih-regionov (in Russ.) - Rossoshanskii, A. I. (2018). Modeling the impact of socio-economic factors on the quality of life in Russia’s regions. Territorial Development Issues, 44(4), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.15838/tdi.2018.4.44.6 (in Russ.) - Skorobogatova, T., Burkaltseva, D., Lunyakov, O., Niyazbekova, Sh., Guk, O., Korotkevich, E., & Goigova, M. (2020). Problems of institutions’ interaction: value of a service as a special form of commodity (logistic approach). Bulletin of national academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 388(6), 213-222.
https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-1467.202 - Statistics Denmark. (2019). Official web-site of statistics about Danish society.
https://www.dst.dk/en# - Statistics Norway. (2019). Official web-site of statistics about Norwegian society.
https://www.ssb.no/en - Statistics Sweden. (2019). Official web-site of statistics about Swedish society.
https://www.scb.se/default____2154.aspx (in Swedish) - Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. K., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2016). Mis-measuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up. The report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute.
https://institutiones.com/download/books/2966-neverno-ocenivaya-nashu-zhizn-pochemu-vvp-ne-imeet-smysla.html (in Russ.) - Węziak-Białowolska, D. (2016). Quality of life in cities – Empirical evidence in comparative European perspective. Cities, 58, 87-96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.016
Received 2.07.2020
Received in revised form 27.07.2020
Accepted 29.07.2020
Available online 10.09.2020
Updated version of the paper as of 27.12.2020