Features of social and labour monitoring in the conditions of transition to remote employment

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 186, Issue 11-12, Pages: 143-151

Citation information:
Maltseva, I., Shulgina, Yu., & Kalimov, O. (2020). Features of social and labour monitoring in the conditions of transition to remote employment. Economic Annals-XXI, 186(11-12), 143-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V186-16


Irina Maltseva
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Department of Regional Economics and Management,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russian Federation
irina-fedorovna@inbox.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8396-6657

Yulya Shulgina
PhD Student (Economics),
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russian Federation
jvl@inbox.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2208-3698

Oleg Kalimov
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Department of Regional Economics and Management,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russian Federation
o_kalimov@mail.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0850-349X

Features of social and labour monitoring in the conditions of transition to remote employment

Abstract. The paper discusses the need to develop effective tools for social and labour monitoring of personnel with regard to the transition to remote employment. It shows that the percentage of employees working remotely has increased over time. The events of 2020 only strengthened this trend and accelerated many processes associated with the digitalization of management and production processes.

The purpose of the study is to analyze and assess the features of social and labour monitoring in the context of the transition to remote employment.

Many companies use special software tools to judge the effectiveness of the use of working time. The authors have analyzed the software products most often used by companies in the transition to remote employment and identified the principles that companies should adhere to in order to effectively transform their activities in the current environment. The implementation of such systems is always associated with the ethical side of control. Therefore, finding a balance between control and trust is an important condition for effective work.

A comparative analysis of the level of technical equipment by country has been carried out. The authors have drawn conclusions about the possibilities of switching to a hybrid mode of operation for certain areas of activity in the future.

The greatest potential for remote employment remains among well-qualified workers. The article shows that the possibilities of switching to remote employment directly depend on the structure of the economy (the share of the financial sector and agriculture), as well as on the possibility of automating the type of activity that brings the greatest income to the state.

Keywords: Social and Labour Monitoring; Remote Employment; Labour Productivity

JEL Сlassіfіcatіon: O1; О4; J24

Acknowledgements and Funding: This article was prepared with the support of the grant from the President of the Russian Federation on state support of leading scientific schools of the Russian Federation No. NSh-2702.2020.6 «Conceptual foundations of a new paradigm of economic development in the era of technological and social transformation» (2020).

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V186-16

References

  1. Cleveland, J. N., Byrne, Z. S., & Cavanagh, T. M. (2015). The future of HR is RH: Respect for humanity at work. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 146-161.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.005
  2. Deloitte. (2020). Employers’ willingness to work remotely: practical aspects and documentation.
    https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ru/Documents/tax/not-home-alone/remote-work.pdf (in Russ.)
  3. Efremov, V. S., & Vladimirova, I. G. (2018). International companies: scale, structure and development tendencies. Ekonomika: Vchera, Segodnya, Zavtra (Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow), 8(10A), 400-412.
    http://publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-economy-2018-10/40-efremov-vladimirova.pdf (in Russ.)
  4. EUROSTAT. (2020). European labour force.
    https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do
  5. Fossen, F., & Sorgner, A. (2019). Mapping the Future of Occupations: Transformative and Destructive Effects of New Digital Technologies on Jobs. Foresight and STI Governance, 13(2), 10-18.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334634967_Mapping_the_Future_of_Occupations_Transformative_and_Destructive_Effects_of_New_Digital_Technologies_on_Jobs
  6. International Labour Organization. (2020). Working from Home: Estimating the worldwide potential.
    https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/non-standard-employment/publications/WCMS_743447/lang–en/index.htm
  7. Jamali, D., El Dirani, A., & Harwood, I. A. (2015). Exploring human resource management roles in corporate social responsibility: the CSR-HRM co-creation model. Business Ethics: a European Review, 24(2), 125-143.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12085
  8. Kaminskaya, O. S., & Kryzhanovskaya, O. A. (2018). Innovative technologies in personnel management. Menedzhment i Marketing: Teoriya i Praktika (Management and Marketing: Theory and Practice), 500-503.
    https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34937847&pf=1
  9. Koksharov, V. A., Agarkov, G. A., & Sushchenko, A. D. (2020). Precarisation of Labour as a Growing Form of Employment of Young Specialists in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ekonomy of Region, 16(4), 1061-1071.
    https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-4 (in Russ.)
  10. Krause, I. (2019). Coworking Spaces: Windows to the Future of Work? Changes in the Organizational Model of Work and the Attitudes of the Younger Generation. Foresight and STI Governance, 13(2), 52-60.
    https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v13y2019i2p52-60.html
  11. Kuchenkova, A. V. (2019). Precarious employment: Methodology of measurement. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 19(1), 134-143.
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-134-143 (in Russ.)
  12. McKinsey Global Institute. (2020). What’s next for remote work: An analysis of 2,000 tasks, 800 jobs, and nine countries.
    https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/whats-next-for-remote-work-an-analysis-of-2000-tasks-800-jobs-and-nine-countries#
  13. Owl Labs. (2019). State of Remote Work 2019.
    https://resources.owllabs.com/state-of-remote-work/2019
  14. RBC. (2020). Deloitte reveals changes in Russians’ spending during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    https://www.rbc.ru/society/08/07/2020/5f05b7f89a79479a75b34de5 (in Russ.)
  15. RBC+. (2020). The pandemic has become a driver for the laptop market.
    https://plus.rbc.ru/news/5fbd0f467a8aa93d40ece166 (in Russ.)
  16. Renwick, D., Jabbour, Ch., Muller-Camen, M., Redman, T., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Contemporary developments in green (environmental) HRM scholarship. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(2), 114-128.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1105844
  17. RGRU. (2020, December 11). Federal Law of December 8, 2020 N 407-FZ «On Amendments to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation regarding the regulation of remote (remote) work and temporary transfer of an employee to remote (remote) work at the initiative of the employer in exceptional cases».
    https://rg.ru/2020/12/11/udalenka-dok.html (in Russ.)
  18. Safronov, E. (2020). «Digital Capitalism» and the Old Fairytale about Lost Time. Russian Sociological Review, 19(1), 318-327.
    https://sociologica.hse.ru/en/2020-19-1/354087129.html (in Russ.)
  19. Sharovatov, Y. (2020). Remote management. How to manage employees remotely. Alpina Digital, Moscow.
    https://www.nemaloknig.net/read-425053 (in Russ.)
  20. Shulgina, Yu. V., & Maltseva, I. F. (2019). Transformation of the personnel management system: digital technologies in social and labor monitoring [Paper presentation]. Digital economy: problems and development prospects: a collection of scientific articles of the Interregional Scientific and Practical Conference, Kursk, 214-219.
    https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41556697&pff=1 (in Russ.)
  21. Statista. (2020). Change in remote work trends due to COVID-19 in the United States in 2020.
    https://www.statista.com/statistics/1122987/change-in-remote-work-trends-after-covid-in-usa
  22. Strebkov, D. O., & Shevchuk, A. V. (2019). The trap of flexible work schedule: how unusual working patterns influence the work-life balance of freelancers. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 3, 86-102.
    https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.3.06
  23. Vertakova, Yu. V., & Plotnikov, V. A. (2019). Workforce and Stimulation of Economic Growth in Russia. Economics and Management, 167(9), 5-12.
    https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2019-9-5-12

Received 12.09.2020
Received in revised form 15.10.2020
Accepted 25.10.2020
Available online 28.12.2020