Economic viability of technological innovations in functional spreads: a cost-benefit analysis of plant fat additives

Economic Annals-XXI: Volume 202, Issue (3-4), Pages: 84-95

Citation information:
Alzhaxina, N., Tuyakbayeva, Zh., Dalabayev, A., & Tolganay, Ye. (2023). Economic viability of technological innovations in functional spreads: a cost-benefit analysis of plant fat additives. Economic Annals-XXI, 202(3-4), 84-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V202-08


Nazym Alzhaxina
PhD (Engineering),
Astana Branch, Kazakh Research Institute of Processing and Food Industry LLP
47 Al-Farabi Avenue, Nur-Sultan, 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan
nazjomka@mail.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7855-0940

Zhanat Tuyakbayeva
PhD (Engineering),
Astana Branch, Kazakh Research Institute of Processing and Food Industry LLP
47 Al-Farabi Avenue, Nur-Sultan, 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan
zhanat_tuyakbaeva@mail.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7271-2822

Askhat Dalabayev
MA (Engineering),
Assistant Professor,
Technical Faculty,
Astana Branch, Kazakh Research Institute of Processing and Food Industry LLP
47 Al-Farabi Avenue, Nur-Sultan, 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan
dalabaev_askhat@mail.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-0697

Yerbolat Tolganay
MA (Engineering),
Astana Branch, Kazakh Research Institute of Processing and Food Industry LLP
47 Al-Farabi Avenue, Nur-Sultan, 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan
tolganay2707@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0273-1563

Economic viability of technological innovations in functional spreads: a cost-benefit analysis of plant fat additives

Abstract. The burgeoning interest in functional foods has significantly influenced various sectors, most notably the food industry. The transition from traditional spreads to functional spreads fortified with plant-based fat additives signifies an essential progression in this realm. While these innovations offer substantial health benefits, they also pose economic implications that have yet to be fully analyzed. Therefore, this research focuses on the economic viability of incorporating technological innovations in functional spreads, using Kazakhstan as a case study for the application of plant fat additives. By employing cost-benefit analysis (CBA) from 2015 to 2022 coupled with a sensitivity analysis, the study critically assesses the economic ramifications of this technological shift. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, amalgamating qualitative interviews with industry stakeholders and a quantitative assessment of production costs, market prices, and expected returns. Further, mathematical models and statistical tools, such as regression analyses and Monte Carlo simulations, are applied to offer a comprehensive understanding. The study demonstrates that the introduction of plant fat additives into functional spreads can be economically viable under specific market conditions. It also identifies potential externalities and subsidies that could influence economic outcomes. Importantly, the research uncovers that, despite initial high costs, the long-term benefits, both monetary and societal, tend to outweigh the economic constraints. The paper concludes with policy recommendations that aim to create a conducive environment for fostering innovation while maintaining economic sustainability. This research fills a significant gap in the current literature by providing a multi-dimensional view of the economic factors influencing the adoption of technological innovations in functional spreads, thereby serving as a cornerstone for future research and policy implications.

Keywords: Functional Spreads; Plant Fat Additives; Economic Viability; Technological Innovations; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Kazakhstan; Food Industry; Health Benefits; Sensitivity Analysis; Market Conditions; Externalities; Subsidies; Economic Sustainability; Policy Recommendations

JEL Classifications: L66; Q13; M11; O32; P42

Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors extend their gratitude and appreciation to the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the financial support of the project «Development of Technology for Functional Spreads from Plant Raw Materials» within the framework of the scientific and technical program for 2021-2023, «Development of Modern Technologies for the Production of Dietary Supplements, Enzymes, Starters, Starch, Oils, etc., for the Advancement of the Food Industry» (BR10764977).

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

Data Availability Statement: The dataset is available from the authors upon request.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V202-08

References

  1. Alraja, M. N., Hussein, M. A., & Ahmed, H. M. S. (2021). What affects digitalization process in developing economies? An evidence from SMEs sector in Oman. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(1), 441-448.
    https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v10i1.2033
  2. Baumann, M., Kamp, J., Pötzschner, F., Bleyhl, B., Dara, A., Hankerson, B., Prishchepov, A. V., Schierhorn, F., Müller, D., Hölzel, N., Krämer, R., Urazaliyev, R., & Kuemmerle, T. (2020). Declining human pressure and opportunities for rewilding in the steppes of Eurasia. Diversity and Distributions, 26(9), 1058-1070.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13110
  3. Brooks, M. E., Kristensen, K., Benthem, K. J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C. W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H. J., Mächler, M., & Bolker, B. M. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R Journal, 9(2), 378-400.
    https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-066
  4. Cohen, A. J., Vicol, M., & Pol, G. (2022). Living under value chains: The new distributive contract and arguments about unequal bargaining power. Journal of Agrarian Change, 22(1), 179-196.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12466
  5. Cruz, J. L., Albisu, L. M., Zamorano, J. P., & Sayadi, S. (2022). Agricultural interactive knowledge models: Researchers’ perceptions about farmers’ knowledges and information sources in Spain. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 28(3), 325-340.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1932537
  6. Dara, A., Baumann, M., Freitag, M., Hölzel, N., Hostert, P., Kamp, J., Müller, D., Prishchepov, A. V., & Kuemmerle, T. (2020). Annual Landsat time series reveal post-Soviet changes in grazing pressure. Remote Sensing of Environment, 239, 111667.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111667
  7. Douma, J. C., & Weedon, J. T. (2019). Analysing continuous proportions in ecology and evolution: A practical introduction to beta and Dirichlet regression. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(9), 1412-1430.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13234
  8. El-Waseif, M. A., Hashem, H. A., & Abd EL-Dayem, H. H. (2013). Using flaxseed oil to prepare therapeutical fat spreads. Annals of Agricultural Science, 58(1), 5-11.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2013.01.002
  9. Hallerman, E. M., Bredlau, J. P., Camargo, L. S. A., Zaidan Dagli, M. L., Karembu, M., Ngure, G., Romero-Aldemita, R., Rocha-Salavarrieta, P. J., Tizard, M., & Walton, M. (2022). Towards progressive regulatory approaches for agricultural applications of animal biotechnology. Transgenic Research, 31, 167-199.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-021-00294-3
  10. Huseynov, R., Aliyeva, N., Bezpalov, V., & Syromyatnikov, D. (2023). Cluster analysis as a tool for improving the performance of agricultural enterprises in the agro-industrial sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-14.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02873-8
  11. Kim, T. S., Decker, E. A., & Lee, J. H. (2012). Antioxidant capacities of α-tocopherol, trolox, ascorbic acid, and ascorbyl palmitate in riboflavin photosensitized oil-in-water emulsions. Food Chemistry, 133(1), 68-75.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.12.069
  12. Kostik, V., Memeti, Sh., & Bauer, B. (2013). Fatty acid composition of edible oils and fats. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, 4, 112-116.
    http://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/11460
  13. Li, B., Zhuo, N., Ji, C., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Influence of Smartphone-Based Digital Extension Service on Farmers’ Sustainable Agricultural Technology Adoption in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9639.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159639
  14. Mohanan, A., Nickerson, M. T., & Ghosh, S. (2018). Oxidative stability of flaxseed oil: Effect of hydrophilic, hydrophobic and intermediate polarity antioxidants. Food Chemistry, 266, 524-533.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.117
  15. Samylovskaya, E., Makhovikov, A., Lutonin, A., Medvedev, D., & Kudryavtseva, R.-E. (2022). Digital Technologies in Arctic Oil and Gas Resources Extraction: Global Trends and Russian Experience. Resources, 11(3), 29.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11030029
  16. Shinkevich, A. I., Vodolazhskaya, E. L., & Baygildin, D. R. (2020). Management of a sustainable development of the oil and gas sector in the context of digitalization. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8, 639-645.
  17. Tashenova, L. V., & Babkin, A. V. (2020). Innovative activity of the enterprises in Kazakhstan: economic and statistical analysis. Bulletin of Karaganda University: Economy Series, 4(100), 142-154.
    https://doi.org/10.31489/2020Ec4/142-154
  18. Tashenova, L., Babkin, A., Mamrayeva, D., & Babkin, I. (2020). Method for Evaluating the Digital Potential of a Backbone Innovative Active Industrial Cluster. International Journal of Technology, 11(8), 1499-1508.
    https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i8.4537
  19. Tereshchuk, L. (2014). Theoretical and practical aspects of the Development of a balanced lipid complex of fat compositions. Food and Raw Materials, 2(2), 59-67.
    https://doi.org/10.12737/5461

Received 20.10.2022
Received in revised form 22.11.2022
Accepted 26.11.2022
Available online 10.04.2023