Economic Annals-XXI: Volume 208, Issue (3-4), Pages: 27-39

Citation information:
Abueva, N., Zhussupova, A., Massakova, S., Buzelo, A., & Abuev, O. (2024). Analyzing the formation of metacompetence in students using EdTech in the learning process: an economic perspective. Economic Annals-XXI, 208(3-4), 27-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V208-05


Nurbanu Abueva
D.Sc. (Political Sciences),
Professor,
Visiting Professor,
Institute of European Languages,
Zhejiang Yuexiu University
No. 428 Kuaiji Road, Yuecheng District, Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, 312000, China;
Professor,
Graduate School of Media and Intercultural Communication,
Turan University
16A Satpayev Str., Almaty, 050013, Republic of Kazakhstan
abu2007@bk.ru; n.abueva@turan-edu.kz
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-9261
Web of Science Researcher ID: HTT-0659-2023

Aliya Zhussupova
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor
of the Art Management Department,
Kurmangazy Kazakh National Conservatory
86 Abylai Khan Ave., Almaty, 050000, Republic of Kazakhstan
a-zhussupova@mail.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9530-918X

Saltanat Massakova
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Program Leader of the
Educational Programme “Management”,
Almaty Management University
227 Rozybakiyev Str., Almaty, 050060, Republic of Kazakhstan
saltanat@mail.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-7920

Anna Buzelo
PhD (Philology),
Professor,
Director,
Graduate School of Media and Intercultural Communication,
Turan University
16A Satpayev Str., Almaty, 050013, Republic of Kazakhstan
buzelo70@mail.ru;
a.buzelo@turan-edu.kz
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5457-1237

Onerbek Abuyev
PhD (Political Sciences),
Associate Professor,
Department of Social and Humanitarian Sciences,
Kazakh State Women’s Pedagogical University
99 Aiteke Bi Str., Almaty, 050000, Republic of Kazakhstan
onerbek.adilbek.62@mail.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4663-9216

Analyzing the formation of metacompetence in students using EdTech in the learning process: an economic perspective

Abstract. In the study, we examine the impact of educational technology (EdTech) on metacompetence development in students, focusing on cost-effectiveness and economic implications. The research spans educational levels from K-12 to higher education in Kazakhstan and China between 2015-2023, addressing gaps in understanding how EdTech shapes students’ metacompetitive abilities and their economic outcomes.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative data from surveys (n = 1000) and learning analytics with qualitative insights from interviews (n = 50) and case studies. The research utilized multiple statistical models including ANOVA, factor analysis, and regression analysis. Data collection covered various educational levels and disciplines, focusing on metacompetence indicators, learning outcomes, and economic variables.

Results: The study revealed that 78.5% of students regularly use EdTech tools, with higher prevalence in STEM fields (85.2%). Three key metacompetence factors were identified: self-regulated learning (α = .85), adaptive problem-solving (α = .79), and collaborative knowledge construction (α = .82). Significant differences were found across demographic groups, with socioeconomic status influencing EdTech access and metacompetence development.

Discussion: The findings demonstrate that well-designed EdTech solutions significantly enhance students’ metacompetence, leading to improved employability and higher expected incomes. The study revealed challenges in implementation, including the digital divide and the need for balanced technology integration. The research provides valuable insights for optimizing EdTech use while ensuring positive economic outcomes.

Scientific Novelty: This study offers a comprehensive analysis of EdTech’s role in metacompetence formation from an economic perspective, introducing a novel conceptual framework that combines educational technology, metacompetence development, and economic outcomes.

Practical Implications: The research provides evidence-based recommendations for educators, policymakers, and EdTech developers to maximize metacompetence formation while ensuring cost-effectiveness. The findings can guide strategic investments in EdTech and inform policies for addressing educational inequities.

Keywords: Metacompetence; Educational Technology; Economic Impact; Digital Economy; Employability; Learning Process

JEL Classіfіcatіon: I21; I25; O33; J24; L86

Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

Data Availability Statement: The dataset is available from the authors upon request.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V208-05

References

  1. Abilgaziyeva, Z., Ybyraimzhanov, K., Tanzharikova, A., Mailybaeva, G., & Zhalgasbayeva, K. (2021). Tecnologia integrativa como base da formação da atividade de fala de alunos do ensino fundamental (Integrative technology as the base of primary schoolchildren’s speech activity formation). Laplage Em Revista, 7(Extra-D), 613-628.
    https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-D1148p.613-628
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353448216_Integrative_technology_as_the_base_of_primary_schoolchildren’s_speech_activity_formation
  2. Amirova, A., Iskakovna, J. M., Zakaryanovna, T. G., Nurmakhanovna, Z. T., & Elmira, U. (2020). Creative and research competence as a factor of professional training of future teachers: Perspective of learning technology. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(4), 278-289.
    https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v12i4.5181
  3. Beloglazova, E. V., Procenko, S. I., Safonova, L. A., & Vasenina, S. I. (2020). Teacher Training for the Development and Application of Electronic Educational Resources in the Professional Activity. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 9(2), 149-156.
    http://www.ijaep.com/index.php/IJAE/article/view/832
  4. Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791-807.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074
  5. Chaikovska, O., & Zbaravska, L. (2020). The efficiency of Quizlet-based EFL vocabulary learning in preparing undergraduates for state English exam. Advanced Education, 7(14), 84-90.
    https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.197808
  6. Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, Ch.-Ch. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799-843.
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
  7. Chien, Ch.-W. (2015). Analysis the effectiveness of three online vocabulary flashcard websites on L2 learners’ level of lexical knowledge. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 111-121.
    https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n5p111
  8. Colorado, J. T., & Eberle, J. (2010). Student demographics and success in online learning Environments. Emporia State Research Studies, 46(1), 4-10.
    https://dspacep01.emporia.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/380/205.2.pdf
  9. Dodge, B. (2001). FOCUS: Five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning & Leading with Technology, 28(8), 6-9, 58.
    https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ643405
  10. Dodge, B. (2006). WebQuests: Past, Present and Future. In A. A. Carvalho (Ed.), Actas do Encontro sobre WebQuest (pp. 3-7). CIEd.
  11. Ducate, L. C., Anderson, L. L., & Moreno, N. (2011). Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 495-524.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01144.x
  12. Fitzgerald, M. S., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017). Peer-mediated reading and writing in a digital, multimodal environment. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(4), 309-326.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1294514
  13. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906
  14. Fursenko, T., Bystrova, B., & Druz, Y. (2021). Integrating Quizlet into aviation English course. Advanced Education, 8(17), 118-127.
    https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.217990
  15. Uzunboylu, H., & Altay, O. (2021). State of affairs in multicultural education research: a content analysis. Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(2), 278-297.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1622408
  16. Vershinina, N. V., Babina, S. A., Beloglazova, E. V., & Lugzаeva, S. I. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Communicative Competence of Future Teachers. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 9(2), 7-14.
    http://www.ijaep.com/index.php/IJAE/article/view/819 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2375734177?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals
  17. Williams, M. T., Lluka, L. J., & Chunduri, P. (2021). Redesigning a First-Year Physiology Course using Learning Analytics to Improve Student Performance. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (iJAI), 3(1), 4-19.
    https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v3i1.21799
  18. Yildiz, E. P. (2021). Analysis of the last 10 years of articles and theses on authentic learning: A meta-analysis study. African Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 505-514.
    https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.92.21.068

Received 7.12.2023
Received in revised form 27.01.2024
Accepted 29.01.2024
Available online 28.04.2024