Development prerequisites for the regulatory approaches of the systemic risk regulation in finances

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 138, Issue 1-2(2), Pages: 20-23

Citation information:
Sysoyeva, L., & Buriak, A. (2014). Development prerequisites for the regulatory approaches of the systemic risk regulation in finances. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(2), 20-23. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v138-05


Larysa Sysoyeva
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Ukrainian Academy of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine
57 Petropavlivcka St., Sumy, 40000, Ukraine
lsysoyeva@mail.ru

Anna Buriak
PhD (Economics),
Lecturer,
Ukrainian Academy of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine
57 Petropavlivcka St., Sumy, 40000, Ukraine
A.Buryak@mail.ru

Development prerequisites for the regulatory approaches of the systemic risk regulation in finances

Abstract. The latest global financial crisis has highlighted the importance of promoting financial stability through better understanding of the crisis sources, one of which is ignoring systemic risk in finance. This study provides starting point theoretical framework of the systemic risk essence based on its micro-, macro- and mixed transmission channels. Systemic risk reasons include common exposure of the financial institutions to asset price bubbles, liquidity provision, panics, contagion sovereign default, currency mismatches in the banking system. Authors give overview of the systemic risk differences in the developing and advanced countries financial system providing a set of the financial systems characteristics which make them more exposing to systemic risk. This study makes an important contribution to the ongoing regulatory discussion by providing correct supervision response to the episodes of financial instability to avoid another crisis of this magnitude in future. Authors highlight conceptual challenges in designing the new policy macro-prudential framework of how best to monitor financial systems and how to set prudential policy accordingly.

Keywords: Systemic Risk; Finance; Supervision System; Macro-Prudential Policy

JEL Classification: E44; E52; F29

References

  1. Heiets, V. (2009). Macroeconomic assessment of Ukrainian monetary and exchange rate policy before and during the financial crisis. Ekonomika Ukrainy (Economic of Ukraine), 2, 5-23 (in Ukr.).
  2. Mishchenko, V. (2009). Directions of Ukrainian financial and economic crisis overcoming. Visnyk Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy (Bulletin of the National Bank of Ukraine), 2, 3-7 (in Ukr.).
  3. Zarutska, O. (2012). Banking supervision using structural and functional analysis: Theory, national and international experience. Sumy: UABS NBU (in Ukr.).
  4. Kaufmann, G. G., & Scott, K. E. (2000). Does Bank Regulation Retard or Contribute to Systemic Risk? Stanford Law School Working Paper, 211, 31.
  5. Goodhart, C. A. E., & Tsomocos, D. P. (2012). Financial stability in practice: towards an uncertain future. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  6. Allen, F., & Carletti, E. (2011). Systemic Risk and Macroprudential Regulation.
    Retrieved from http://www.iea-world.com/docs/1043.pdf
  7. International Monetary Fund (2013). World Economic Outlook.
    Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/
  8. The National Bank of Ukraine (2013). Monthly Analytical and Statistical Edition of NBU. Kyiv: NBU (in Ukr.).
  9. The Bank for International Settlements (1994). 64th Annual Report.
    Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/
  10. The World Bank (2012). World Bank Database. Bank Regulation and Supervision.
    Retrieved from http://econ.worldbank.org/
  11. Sundararajan, V., & Enoch, Ch. (2002). Financial Soundness Indicators: Analytical Aspects and Country Practices. IMF Occasional Paper, 212.
    Retrieved from http://www.jvi.org/uploads/tx_abaeasydownloads/L-12%20-%20Sundararajan-fin-soundness-indicators-OP212.pdf

Received 15.11.2013