Multiculturalism as a means of nations and countries interethnic unity achieving

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 146, Issue 11-12, Pages: 15-18

Citation information:
Holovatyi, M. (2014). Multiculturalism as a means of nations and countries interethnic unity achieving. Economic Annals-XXI, 11-12, 15-18. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v146-04/


Mykola Holovatyi
D.Sc. (Political Sciences),
Professor, Vice-Rector,
Interregional Academy of Personnel Management
2 Frometivska Str., Kyiv, 03039, Ukraine
m.f.holovaty@ukr.net

Multiculturalism as a means of nations and countries interethnic unity achieving

Abstract. Multiculturalism is an objective phenomenon of current societal development and acts as an important basis of social advancement for no other reason that human communities cannot be uniform and static. In the context of emergence post-industrial, information-oriented societies and high-capacity globalization processes, multiculturalism shapes a multi-polar world, which faces fundamental changes in the values of man, group, and society. Therefore, mankind has faced a problem, on the one hand, of certain unification/alignment of life models and on the other hand – the problem of sustainable development and advancement of historical and traditional cultures, ways of life, and interpersonal dealings.

The purpose of the present publication is to consider the phenomenon of multiculturalism as a process, which leads to multiculturalism policies, cultural multiculturalism but that demands from countries and peoples to avoid, in the context of diversity of cultures, ideologies, any conflicts, off stands, and divisions, and to learn to live in unity and cooperation. This is particularly so with political differentiation, which has taken on in the 21st century exceptional acuteness and topicality.

Research into this problem was conducted with the use of the historical-analytical, synergetic, culturological, comparative and other methods, which enables to emphasize the similarities and differences in multiculturalism, the specifics of its manifestation, in contemporary Ukraine.

The key research findings offer an opportunity to conclude that multiculturalism: a) is a specific, historically objective phenomenon of societal life, which ensure real social advancement; b) multiculturalism policy should be secured through a political dialog among countries and nations; c) in multicultural, multiethnic societies, a state ideology is the unifying factor of entire society that is based on the principles of multiculturalism, democracy, and humanism.

Keywords: Multiculturalism; Unity; Differentiation; Integration; National Policy

JEL Classification: Z18; Z19

References

  1. Bybler, V. S. (1997). Dialog of Cultures (Philosophy, Psychology, and Pedagogy). Running a School. The Anthology of Developing Management, 12, 1-3 (in Russ.).
  2. Volkov, J. G., & Polikarpov, V. S. (1999). Man: an Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Gardariki (in Russ.).
  3. Gumilev, L. N. (1979). Ethnogenesis and Earth’s Biosphere. Leningrad: Genesis (in Russ.).
  4. Ushakova, I. A. (2004). Globalization and Multiculturalism: Development Trends and Options. Vestnik Novhorodskoho hosudarstvennoho universiteta (Journal Novhorod State University), 27, 32-41 (in Russ.).
  5. Mintzel, A. (1997). Multikulturelle Gesellschatten in Europa and Nordamerica – Konzepte, Analysen, Streitzagen, Betunde. Passau: Wissenschaftsverlag Rothe.
  6. Preston, P. W. (1997). Political-Cultural Identity: Citizens and Nations in a Global Era. London: SAGE publication.
  7. Proceedings of the Baku International Humanitarian Forum, October 4-5, 2012 (in Russ.).
  8. Averyanov, V. B., Batanov, A. V., & Baulin, Y. V. et al. (2003). The Constitution of Ukraine. A Theoretical and Practical Commentary. Kharkiv: Pravo (in Ukr.).
  9. Mamedzade, I. (2012). Multiculturalism as a Philosophical Problem and an Ideologeme. Proceedings of the Baku International Humanitarian Forum, October 4-5 (in Russ.).
  10. Aliyev, I. I. (2011, April 7-9). A Report at the World Forum on Intercultural Dialog. Baku, Azerbaijan.
    Retrieved from http://ru.president.az/articles/1845 (in Russ.).
  11. Lebedeva, N. M. (1999). Introduction to Ethnic and Cross-Cultural Psychology: a Study Guide. Moscow: Klyuch-C (in Russ.).
  12. Malakhov, V. (2001). Cultural Pluralism versus Multiculturalism. Moscow: Dom intellektualnoy knigi (in Russ.).
  13. Nizamova, L. R. (2004). The Ideology and Policy of Multiculturalism: Potential, Specific Features, and Importance for Russia. Materials of the Conference «Civil society in multinational and poly-confessional regions» (pp. 36-39). Moscow: Gandalf (in Russ.).
  14. Fukuyama, F. (2007). Identity and Migration.
    Retrieved from http://n-europe.eu/content/index.php?p=1290
  15. Huntington, S. (2004). Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity (Trans. from Eng.). Moscow: Tranzitkniga (in Russ.).
  16. Habermas, J. (2002). The European Nation State: Its Achievements and Its Limitations. On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship. Nations and Nationalism (Trans. from Eng.). Moscow: Praxis (in Russ.).
  17. Antoniuk, O. (2003). The Historical Bases of Ethnopolicy of Ukraine. Liudyna i polityka (The Man and Politics), 2, 25-31 (in Ukr.).
  18. Grushevitskaya, T. G., Popkov, V. D., & Sadokhin, A. P. (2004). Culture of Mutual Understanding and Cross-Cultural Understanding. Moscow: Osnova (in Russ.).
  19. Drozhzhina C. (2008). Multiculturalism: Theoretical and Practical Aspects. Politychnyi menedzhment (Political Management), 3(30), 96-106 (in Ukr.).
  20. Kotyhorenko, B. (2003). Trends in the Ethnic and Ethno-Lingual Dynamics of the Population of Ukraine in 1959-2001 (based on censuses statistics). Liudyna i polityka (The Man and Politics), 2, 12-24 (in Ukr.).
  21. Sarzhan, S. N. (2001). National Minorities in Socio-Political Life of Ukraine. Visnyk DonDUET, Ser. Humanitarni nauky (Herald DonDUET, Chapt. Arts), 3, 86-92 (in Ukr.).
  22. Le Coadic Ronan (2007). Multiculturalism.
    Retrieved from http://www.social-anthropology.ru/node/178 (in Russ.).
  23. Vorona, B., & Shulha, M. (Eds.). (2010). The Ukrainian Society in 1992-2010. Sociological Monitoring. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of NAS of Ukraine (in Ukr.).
  24. Belebekha, I. A. (2010). World-Outlook Pearls of the Ukrainian National Idea. Kharkiv: FOP Zdorovyi Ya. A. (in Ukr.).
  25. Sabadukha, V. (2013). Personalism as a Ukrainian State Ideology. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo (Psychology and Society), 1(51), 21-30 (in Ukr.).

Received 03.11.2014