Society

Digitalization: potential risks for civil society

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 186, Issue 11-12, Pages: 36-47

Citation information:
Aseeva, I., & Budanov, V. (2020). Digitalization: potential risks for civil society. Economic Annals-XXI, 186(11-12), 36-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V186-05

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Irina Aseeva
D.Sc. (Philosophy),
Professor,
Department of Philosophy and Sociology,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
irinaaseeva2011@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-7762

Vladimir Budanov
D.Sc. (Philosophy),
Professor,
Department of Philosophy and Sociology,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
budsyn@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2371-8659

Digitalization: potential risks for civil society

Abstract. Transition to the digital economy involves the restructuring of industries, transport and agriculture and gives new opportunities for work with Big Data and optimization the processes in the economy via smart environments, cryptocurrencies and hybrid forms of interaction between human beings and artificial intelligence. Such global transformations could not but cause a massive change in both consciousness at the socio-anthropological level and traditional forms of management at the civilizational level.

Speaking about the civil society in the era of digitalization, it should be understood that this is, first of all, a network society, and without understanding this type of society it is pointless to talk about new forms of civil society. The network society was considered a well-studied object of research by the early 2000s, however today the radical acceleration of ICT and other processes are connected with digital information-network revolution involving artificial intelligence, the possibility of which was not even thought about 20 years ago.

Therefore, the main purpose of our paper is an attempt to conceptualize potential risks for civil society connected with the development, testing and implementation of digital services and technologies in the global economy. To achieve this, we used system and synergistic philosophical and methodological approaches developed by the modern post-non-classical science and applied for self-developing systems.

To reveal the global trends in the economy and related social problems, we undertook comparative and interdisciplinary analyses based on sources available.

Sociological, philosophical and methodological reflections about radical changes in the anthropotechnosphere during the COVID-19 pandemic have revealed a number of serious problems that threaten the well-being of civil society, such as the aggravation of economic inequality, the collapse of many small businesses due to the quarantine and the introduction of remote forms of work, mass layoffs of qualified specialists, job cuts including the area of intellectual work, transport and service, as well as a significant decrease in the income of the population, decline in the quality of education, a sharp reduction in tourist flows, the ban on mass demonstrations and gatherings, which is an integral basis of the life of civil society. Thus, during the period of pandemic lockdowns, there is a significant change in the economic and socio-cultural environment of modern civilization.

At the same time, the crisis situation provides means not only for the development of civil society, but also for the maintenance of enforcing and regulating functions of the state, which can upset the harmonious balance of interaction between society and any state (capitalist, socialist) or the global state of TNCs.

An analysis of the world economic development in the 21st century has revealed some signs of a systemic crisis of civilization, along with the processes of digitalization as a catalyst for the shift of the paradigm of civilizational development and a catalyst for civil movements. The most striking Umwelts («perceptual environment») of civil society emerging in the digital realm are described in the paper.

Keywords: Digitalization; Civil Society; Civilizational Crisis; Pandemic; Risks

JEL Classification: Z13

Acknowledgements and Funding: The research is financed by the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 19-18-00504 «Sociotechnical environment of digital reality: ontological matrices, ethical and axiological regulative structures, roadmaps, and information support for management decision-making».

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V186-05

References

  1. 100-bal. (2020). Summary of the report on the state of civil society in the Russian Federation. 
    https://100-bal.ru/ekonomika/237391/index.html
  2. Aleksanyan, A. S. (2006). On the issue of defining the concept of «civil society». Voprosy filosofii (Philosophy questions), 12, 54-71 (in Russ.).
  3. Anheier, H. K. (2014). Civil society research: ten years on. Journal of Civil Society, 10(4), 335-339. 
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2014.984973
  4. Arshinov, V. I., & Budanov, V. G. (2020). Network information revolutions and the Great Anthropological Transition: an evolutionary aspect. Complexity, Reason, Post non classic, 4, 45-56 (in Russ.).
  5. Bakutina, N. S. (2015). Civil society and new information and communication technology. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, 2, 79-84. 
    http://www.unn.ru/pages/e-library/vestnik/19931778_2015_-_2_unicode/11.pdf (in Russ.)
  6. Buryak, V. V. (2011). Global civil society and network revolutions. DIAIPI, Simferopol (in Russ.).
  7. Caiani, M., & Kroll, P. (2015). The Transnationalization of the Extreme Right and the Use of the Internet. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 39(4), 331-351. 
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2014.973050
  8. Castells, M. (1999). Formation of the Society of Network Structures. New Post-industrial Wave in the West (pp. 494-505). Academia, Moscow.
  9. Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. GU HSE, Moscow.
  10. Castells, M. (2004). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. U-Faktoriia, Ekaterinburg.
  11. Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78-93. 
    https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002716207311877
  12. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movementsin the Internet Age. Polity Press, Cambridge.
  13. Cheema, G. S. (2013). Civil society networks in China and Vietnam: Informal pathbreakers in health and the environment. China Review, 13(2), 153-156. 
    https://muse.jhu.edu/article/524760/pdf
  14. Chugunov, A. V. (2002). Sociology of the Internet: Social and political orientation of Internet users. Sociological society named after M. M. Kovalevsky.
  15. Civil Society at Risk? International Perspectives. (2019, April). Conference Report: Panels and Roundtable, (pp. 63-74). Montreal, Canada.
  16. DataReportal. (2020, January 30). Digital 2020: Global Digital Overview. 
    https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-digital-overview
  17. Davidiv, D. (2021). UN Secretary General: The world is in the deepest crisis in 100 years and may split. 
    https://teknoblog.ru/2021/01/26/109970 (in Russ.)
  18. Delanty, G. (1998). Social Theory and European Transformation: Is There a European Society? Sociological Research Online, 3(1). 
    https://doi.org/10.5153%2Fsro.156
  19. DeWiel, B. (1997). A Conceptual History of Civil Society: From Greek Beginnings to the End of Marx. Past Imperfect, 6, 3-42. 
    http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/pi/article/download/1422/963&ved=2ahUKE
    wi2lO_V3cHvAhWtz4UKHWg1Dj8QFjABegQIChAB&usg=AOvVaw25F7vmwiCtgX32MTxtnVVw
  20. Federal State Statistics Service. (2020). Information about social and economic situation in Russia. 
    http://www.gks.ru
  21. Federal State Statistics Service. (2020). Selective Federal Statistical Observation on the use of information technologies and information and telecommunications networks by the population. 
    https://gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/business/it/fed_nabl-croc/index.html (in Russ.)
  22. Fine, I. (1997). Civil society theory, enlargement and critique. Democratization, 4(1), 7-28. 
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349708403499
  23. Gerasimov, A. V., & Zhigaeva, K. V. (2014). Civil society and the state: social aspects of interaction. Bulletin of the Moscow State Institute of Humanities and Economics, 20(4), 40-48.
  24. HSE University. (2020). HSE Statistical Investigations. 
    https://www.hse.ru/primarydata
  25. ICNL. (2020). US Protest Law Tracker. 
    https://www.icnl.org/usprotestlawtracker
  26. Ivanov, D. V. (2000). Virtualization of society. Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie, Moscow.
  27. Jensen, M. N. (2006). Concepts and conceptions of civil society. Journal of Civil Society, 2(1), 39-56. 
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680600730934
  28. Khoros, V. (1997). Civil society: the way it is formed, and whether it is being formed. MeiMO, 5, 8-23.
  29. Kilimova, L. V. (2018). Socio-cultural bases of manifestation of social activity in civil practices. Proceedings of the SWSU: Economics, Sociology. Management, 8(4), 244-252.
  30. Kochetov, A. N. (1999). Influence of the Internet on society development. Information Society, 5, 43-48. 
    https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9117972 (in Russ.)
  31. Kravchenko, S. A. (2019). Sociology on the move: the demand for the humanistic digital turn. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 19(3), 397-405. 
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-3-397-405
  32. Lathrop, D., & Rum, L. (2010). Open government: collaboration, transparency and participation in practice. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol.
  33. Latour, B. (2014). Higher School of Economics. In S. Gavrilenko (Eds.), Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. HSE, Moscow.
  34. Mann, M. (1996). Society as organized networks of power. Modern Sociological Theories of Society. INION, Moscow.
  35. NAFI. (2020, December 04). Digital literacy of Russians. 
    https://nafi.ru/analytics/tsifrovaya-gramotnost-rossiyanissledovanie-2020
  36. Oleskin, A. V. (2016). Network society: Necessity and possible strategies of building. Network (reticular) socio-economic formation: quasi-socialist principles and meritocracy. URSS, Moscow (in Russ.).
  37. Resnik, M. Yu. (1998). Civil society as a phenomenon of civilization. MGSU Soiuz, Moscow (in Russ.).
  38. Romanenko, L. M. (1994). Civil society not only exists, but has never ceased to exist. SotcIs, 1, 6-12 (in Russ.).
  39. Rumford, C. (2003). European Civil Society or Transnational Social Space?: Conceptions of Society in Discourses of EU Citizenship, Governance and the Democratic Deficit: an Emerging Agenda. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(1), 25-43. 
    https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1368431003006001555
  40. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1997). The civil society sector. Society 34, 60-65.
  41. Schwab, K., & Malleret, T. (2020). COVID-19: The Great Reset. 
    http://reparti.free.fr/schwab2020.pdf
  42. Simiti, M. (2017). Civil society and economy: Greek civil society during the economic crisis. Journal of Civil Society, 13(4), 353-373.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2017.1355033
  43. Soskіn, O. (2019). Biblic aspect of time and space in modern global economy. Legal Bible Almanach, 1, 65-87. 
    http://www.okp-elpis.pl/book,open,6756,0,PRAWOS%C5%81AWNY_BIBLIJNY_ALMANACH
    _I_2019.html (in Russ.)
  44. Strategic Culture Foundation. (2020). The so-called inclusive capitalism – a joint project of Rothschild and the Pope. 
    https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2020/12/24/tak-nazyvaemyj-inkljuzivnyj-kapitalizm-sovmestnyj-proekt-rotshildov-i-papy-rimskogo-52541.html (in Russ.)
  45. The World Bank. (2020). The World Bank database. 
    http://www.worldbank.org
  46. Vartanova, E. (1999). Information Society and Mass Media of Finland in the European perspective. Moscow University, Moscow (in Russ.).
  47. Vasilenko, L. A., & Zotov, V. V. (2020). Digitalization of public administration in Russia: risks, casuses, problems. Digital Sociology, 3(2), 4-16. 
    https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2020-2-4-16
  48. Vasilenko, L. A., Zotov, V. V., & Zakharova, S. A. (2020). Social media potential for developing participatory governance. RUDN Journal of sociology, 20(4), 864-876. 
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-864-876
  49. WebCanape. (2020). All Internet statistics for 2020 – figures and trends in the world and in Russia. 
    https://www.web-canape.ru/business/internet-2020-globalnaya-statistika-i-trendy (in Russ.)
  50. Whitlock, W. (2008). Twitter Revolutions: How social media and mobile marketing is changing the way we do business and market online. Xeno Press., Moscow.
  51. World Economic Forum. (2013). The future role of civil society. World scenario series. World Economic Forum, Cologne, Geneva.
  52. Yadov, G. B. (2004). Information and society. Moscow.

Received 2.09.2020
Received in revised form 12.10.2020
Accepted 28.10.2020
Available online 28.12.2020
Updated version of the paper as of 21.01.2021

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , ,

More Papers