Will production in the modern world and its regions return to a slow growth regime?

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 187, Issue 1-2, Pages: 4-14

Citation information:
Komarova, V., Mietule, I., Arbidane, I., Tumalavičius, V., & Prakapienė, D. (2021). Will production in the modern world and its regions return to a slow growth regime? Economic Annals-XXI, 187(1-2), 4-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V187-01

Vera Komarova
D.Sc. (Economics),
Leading Researcher,
Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Daugavpils University
13 Vienibas Str., Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9829-622X

Iveta Mietule
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor, Rector,
Rezekne Academy of Technologies
115 Atbrivosanas Alley, Rezekne, LV-4601, Latvia
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7662-9866

Iluta Arbidane
D.Sc. (Economics),
Dean, Faculty of Economics and Management,
Rezekne Academy of Technologies
115 Atbrivosanas Alley, Rezekne, LV-4601, Latvia
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9762-3874

Vladas Tumalavičius
D.Sc. (Law),
Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Daugavpils University
13 Vienibas Str., Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia
Lecturer, Research Group for Security Institution Management,
General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania
5A Silo Str., Vilnius, LT-10322, Lithuania
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0811-0074

Dalia Prakapienė
D.Sc. (Pedagogy),
Associate Professor,
Defence Economics and Management Research Group,
General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania
5A Silo Str., Vilnius, LT-10322, Lithuania
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4415-2327

Will production in the modern world and its regions return to a slow growth regime?

Abstract. The main idea of this paper originated from the analysis of the fundamental research of the French economist Th. Piketty «Capital in the Twenty-First Century» (2013). Based on the study of historical data he argued that in the long-term global production growth has always been relatively slow and it will slow down even more in the future, at least with regard to its demographic component.

The purpose of the presented research is to investigate empirically to what extent the dynamics of world production at the beginning of the 21st century corresponds to a slow growth regime (both in its demographic and economic component) and to find out whether there is production growth inequality between the regions of the world.

The theoretical part of the research methodology is based on a unified growth theory. It explains why production growth has led to a significant increase in inequality between regions of the world over the past two centuries and contributed to further division of the global economic space into «worlds-economies» with different patterns of production growth. In the empirical part of the study, the authors use the methods of panel data analysis.

During the period from 1992 to 2019, there was a slowdown of global production growth only in its demographic component, while the world average increase in the economic component of production growth (and, consequently, the total production growth) is constantly accelerating. However, its structure and pace vary significantly between regions of the world. The modern world can be conditionally divided into «worlds-economies» which have different, sometimes diametrically opposite, patterns of production growth.

At the beginning of the 21st century, most regions of the modern world are still far from a slow growth regime in terms of production, especially with regard to its economic component, which cannot last long without a substantial dematerialization of the produced GDP.

Keywords: Production Growth; Demographic Component of Production Growth; Economic Component of Production Growth; Spatial Inequality; Slow Growth Regime; Regions of the World; Growth Management

JEL Classifications: O47; R11; C33

Acknowledgements and Funding: This work supported by the national research programme «Latvian heritage and future challenges for the sustainability of the state» under project «Challenges for the Latvian state and society and the solutions in international context (Interframe-LV)», number VPP-IZM-2018/1-0005.

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

Data Availability Statement: World Inequality Database (WID) https://wid.world

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V187-01


  1. d’Alpoim Guedes, J., Bestor, T. C., Carrasco, D., Flad, R., Fosse, E., Herzfeld, M., Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C., Lewis, C. M., Liebmann, M., Meadow, R., Patterson, N., Price, M., Reiches, M., Richardson, S., Shattuck-Heidorn, H., Ur, J., Urton, G., & Warinner, C. (2013). Is Poverty in Our Genes? Current Anthropology, 54(1), 71-79.
  2. Ashraf, Q., & Galor, O. (2011). Dynamics and Stagnation in the Malthusian Epoch. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2003-2041.
  3. Ashraf, Q., & Galor, O. (2013). The «Out of Africa» Hypothesis, Human Genetic Diversity, and Comparative Economic Development. American Economic Review, 103(1), 1-46.
  4. Becker, S., Cinnirella, F., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The Trade-off between Fertility and Education: Evidence from Before the Demographic Transition. Journal of Economic Growth, 15, 177-204.
  5. Birbirenko, S., Zhadanova, Yu., & Banket, N. (2020). Influence of Pandemic of Coronavirus Infection COVID-19 on Economic Resilience of Ukrainian Enterprises. Economic Annals-XXI, 183(5-6), 66-78.
  6. Blecker, R. A. (2014). Economic Stagnation in the United States: Underlying Causes and Global Consequences. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 34(4), 689-725.
  7. Braudel, F. (1967). Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Centuries. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  8. Braudel, F. (1996). The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, Vol. 1 (1st ed.). University of California Press.
  9. Demaria, F., Schneider, F., Sekulova, F., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2013). What is Degrowth? From an Activist Slogan to a Social Movement. Environmental Values, 22(2), 191-215.
  10. Florida, R. (2002a). The Economic Geography of Talent. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 92(4), 743-755.
  11. Florida, R. (2002b). The Rise of the Creative Class, and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  12. Florida, R. (2006). The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent. New York, NY: Harper Business.
  13. Galor, O. (2011). Unified Growth Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  14. Galor, O. (2018). Human Capital, Fertility and Growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Galor, O., & Moav, O. (2002). Natural Selection and the Origin of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1133-1191.
  16. Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (2000). Population, Technology, and Growth: From Malthusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and Beyond. American Economic Review, 90(4), 806-828.
  17. Goncharov, N. V. (2020). Fundamental determinants and consequences of consumerism in modern capitalist societies. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 20(4), 778-789.
    http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/25210/18875 (in Russ.)
  18. Heckman, J. (1981). Statistical Models for Discrete Panel Data. In Manski, C. F., & McFadden, D. (Eds.). Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  19. Heckman, J. (2001). Micro Data, Heterogeneity and Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel Lecture. Journal of Political Economy, 109(4), 673-748.
  20. Howkins, J. (2001). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money From Ideas. London: Penguin.
  21. INSEAD (The Business School for the World), the Adecco Group, & Tata Communications. (2019). The Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2019: Entrepreneurial Talent and Global Competitiveness. France: Fontainebleau.
  22. Kerimoglu, E., & Karahasan, B. (2012). Geography of Talent for Understanding Regional Disparities in Spain. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 4(2), 103-128.
  23. Komarova, V. (2016). Many «Developments» in One World. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
  24. Komarova, V., Lonska, J., Lavrinenko, O., & Menshikov, V. (2018). Influence of Existing Social and Economic Interactions on Sustainable Territory Development: The Case of Iceland. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 412-437.
  25. Komlos, J., & Artzrouni, M. (1990). Mathematical Investigations of the Escape from the Malthusian Trap. Mathematical Population Studies, 2(4), 269-287.
  26. Lukkezen, J., & Kool, C. (2015). Lessons Learnt from Seven Years of Stagnation in the Eurozone. CPB Policy Brief. Amsterdam: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  27. Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. L. (2004). Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River Junction VT.
  28. Melecis, V., Krisjane, Z., Klavins, M., Aigars, J., Elferts, D., & Viksne, J. (2012). Preliminary Characteristics of Ecological and Socioeconomic Components and Their Interaction within the Long Term Socioecological Research Platform of Latvia. Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University, 13(7), 87-92.
  29. Paganetto, L. (2016). Stagnation Versus Growth in Europe. Capitalism in the 21st Century. Springer.
  30. Piketty, Th. (2015). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press (in Russ.).
  31. Ratnikova, Т. А. (2006). Introduction into Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Economic Journal of the Highest School of Economics, 2, 267-316.
    https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vvedenie-v-ekonometricheskiy-analiz-panelnyh-dannyh (in Russ.)
  32. Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Random House.
  33. Rezk, M. A., Piccinetti, L., Radwan, A., Salem, N. M., Sakr, M. M., & Khasawneh, A. (2020). Egypt Beyond COVID-19, the Best and the Worst-Case Scenarios. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 147-162.
  34. Shiue, C. H. (2017). Human Capital and Fertility in Chinese Clans before Modern Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 22, 351-396.
  35. Steshenko, Ju., Artemyev, A., Myktybaev, T., Khavanova, I., Masterov, A., & Ponomareva, M. (2019). Assessment of the Impact of Socio-Economic Factors on Productivity Increase. Economic Annals-XXI, 177(5-6), 70-81.
  36. Vollrath, D. (2020). Fully Grown: Why a Stagnant Economy is a Sign of Success. University of Chicago Press.
  37. Wade, R. H., & Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (2012). Iceland’s Rise, Fall, Stabilization and Beyond. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 127-144.
  38. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
  39. Wallerstein, I. (1992). The West, Capitalism, and the Modern World-System. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 15(4), 561-619.
  40. World Economic Forum. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  41. World Inequality Database (WID). (2021). Data Tables.

Received 8.12.2020
Received in revised form 28.12.2020
Accepted 11.01.2021
Available online 28.02.2021